2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Spoken and Written Language

Celia Roberts, Brian Street

Open publisher page 49 citations

Abstract

Until the middle of the twentieth century, linguists and anthropologists paid little attention to the relationship between and differences in spoken and written language. Since then, there has been a considerable literature attempting to define the differences between them (Goody and Watt, 1968; Ong, 1982; Olson, 1988). More recently, anthropologists and sociolinguists have challenged this literature, arguing that it treats literacy and oracy in purely technical terms, rather than as social practices embedded in power structures (Scribner and Cole, 1981; Heath, 1983; Street, 1984; Graff, 1987; Barton, 1994).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Until the middle of the twentieth century, linguists and anthropologists paid little attention to the relationship between and differences in spoken and written language. Since then, there has been a considerable literature attempting to define the differences between them (Goody and Watt, 1968; Ong, 1982; Olson, 1988). More recently, anthropologists and sociolinguists have challenged this literature, arguing that it treats literacy and oracy in purely technical terms, rather than as social practices embedded in power structures (Scribner and Cole, 1981; Heath, 1983; Street, 1984; Graff, 1987; Barton, 1994).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Until the middle of the twentieth century, linguists and anthropologists paid little attention to the relationship between and differences in spoken and written language. Since then, there has been a considerable literature attempting to define the differences between them (Goody and Watt, 1968; Ong, 1982; Olson, 1988). More recently, anthropologists and sociolinguists have challenged this literature, arguing that it treats literacy and oracy in purely technical terms, rather than as social practices embedded in power structures (Scribner and Cole, 1981; Heath, 1983; Street, 1984; Graff, 1987; Barton, 1994).

Key concepts: Linguistics, Literacy, Spoken language, Watt, Written language, Power (physics), Sociology, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spoken and Written Language — Research Paper | ScholarLens