2019Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical EngineeringRequires access

Pressure swing distillation for the separation of methyl acetate‐methanol azeotrope

Keliang Wang, Jing Li, Ping Liu, Minglei Lian, Tingzhao Du

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Abstract Pressure swing distillation (PSD) process was used to separate methyl acetate‐methanol azeotrope. Through the phase diagram analysis, distillation sequence and technological process were determined. On the basis of the principle of the minimum total annual cost (TAC), design variables such as feeding position, reflux ratio, and column plate number were optimized and the optimal parameters were determined. The high‐pressure column (HPC) under various pressures were analysed. The economic results of the PSD without heat integration, with partial heat integration, and with full heat integration were compared. The comparison results indicate that the TAC of the PSD without heat integration is the highest. The PSD with partial integration and full heat integration can effectively reduce the total capital cost and total operating cost. Compared with the PSD without heat integration, the TACs of partial heat integration and full heat integration exhibit 27% and 30% savings, respectively. Therefore, the PSD with full heat integration is more economically reasonable for separating methyl acetate‐methanol azeotrope.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Pressure swing distillation (PSD) process was used to separate methyl acetate‐methanol azeotrope. Through the phase diagram analysis, distillation sequence and technological process were determined. On the basis of the principle of the minimum total annual cost (TAC), design variables such as feeding position, reflux ratio, and column plate number were optimized and the optimal parameters were determined. The high‐pressure column (HPC) under various pressures were analysed. The economic results of the PSD without heat integration, with partial heat integration, and with full heat integration were compared. The comparison results indicate that the TAC of the PSD without heat integration is the highest. The PSD with partial integration and full heat integration can effectively reduce the total capital cost and total operating cost. Compared with the PSD without heat integration, the TACs of partial heat integration and full heat integration exhibit 27% and 30% savings, respectively. Therefore, the PSD with full heat integration is more economically reasonable for separating methyl acetate‐methanol azeotrope.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Pressure swing distillation (PSD) process was used to separate methyl acetate‐methanol azeotrope. Through the phase diagram analysis, distillation sequence and technological process were determined. On the basis of the principle of the minimum total annual cost (TAC), design variables such as feeding position, reflux ratio, and column plate number were optimized and the optimal parameters were determined. The high‐pressure column (HPC) under various pressures were analysed. The economic results of the PSD without heat integration, with partial heat integration, and with full heat integration were compared. The comparison results indicate that the TAC of the PSD without heat integration is the highest. The PSD with partial integration and full heat integration can effectively reduce the total capital cost and total operating cost. Compared with the PSD without heat integration, the TACs of partial heat integration and full heat integration exhibit 27% and 30% savings, respectively. Therefore, the PSD with full heat integration is more economically reasonable for separating methyl acetate‐methanol azeotrope.

Key concepts: Azeotrope, Process integration, Distillation, Thermodynamics, Methanol, Methyl acetate, Process engineering, Process (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pressure swing distillation for the separation of methyl acetate‐methanol azeotrope — Research Paper | ScholarLens