2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of the Compliance with the Principles of Radiation Protection in the Dental Offices in Mashhad, Iran

Azam Ahmadian Yazdi, Samareh Mortazavi, Gholamhasan Rahmannia

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Radiography plays a key role in the diagnosis, planning, and efficacy of treatment. Dentists with various levels of knowledge and conduct use intraoral radiography devices. The present study aimed to examine the radiography equipment and evaluate the compliance with the principles of radiation protection in the dental offices in Mashhad, Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 232 dental offices employing intraoral radiographic devices in 2015. Demographic data of the dentists, participation in educational courses, application of dosimeters, protection methods for patients and personnel, and the device features were recorded. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 19. Results: In this study, 22.9 of the radiography devices were equipped with digital systems. The application of the E-speed film and angle bisector technique was estimated at 77.1 and 79.7, respectively. Most dental offices did not use thyroid shields (61.6) and lead aprons (54.7). Among the methods of personnel protection, lead screen (47.4) and maintaining distance (30.2) were used more frequently compared to the other approaches. In 65 of the dental offices, quality control of the devices was performed every year. Mean score of compliance with the principles of protection was 42.9, and radiation protection was at a moderate level in 77 of the dental offices. Additionally, no significant association was observed between the observance of protection principles with gender and work experience of the dentists. Conclusion: Several radiographic devices are used for improving imaging quality and reducing the absorbed radiation dose in patients. Considering the moderate level of compliance with the principles of radiation protection in most of the studied dental offices in Mashhad, it is recommended that training courses be offered in this regard for the accurate monitoring of these principles in the application radiography devices in dental offices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Radiography plays a key role in the diagnosis, planning, and efficacy of treatment. Dentists with various levels of knowledge and conduct use intraoral radiography devices. The present study aimed to examine the radiography equipment and evaluate the compliance with the principles of radiation protection in the dental offices in Mashhad, Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 232 dental offices employing intraoral radiographic devices in 2015. Demographic data of the dentists, participation in educational courses, application of dosimeters, protection methods for patients and personnel, and the device features were recorded. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 19. Results: In this study, 22.9 of the radiography devices were equipped with digital systems. The application of the E-speed film and angle bisector technique was estimated at 77.1 and 79.7, respectively. Most dental offices did not use thyroid shields (61.6) and lead aprons (54.7). Among the methods of personnel protection, lead screen (47.4) and maintaining distance (30.2) were used more frequently compared to the other approaches. In 65 of the dental offices, quality control of the devices was performed every year. Mean score of compliance with the principles of protection was 42.9, and radiation protection was at a moderate level in 77 of the dental offices. Additionally, no significant association was observed between the observance of protection principles with gender and work experience of the dentists. Conclusion: Several radiographic devices are used for improving imaging quality and reducing the absorbed radiation dose in patients. Considering the moderate level of compliance with the principles of radiation protection in most of the studied dental offices in Mashhad, it is recommended that training courses be offered in this regard for the accurate monitoring of these principles in the application radiography devices in dental offices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Radiography plays a key role in the diagnosis, planning, and efficacy of treatment. Dentists with various levels of knowledge and conduct use intraoral radiography devices. The present study aimed to examine the radiography equipment and evaluate the compliance with the principles of radiation protection in the dental offices in Mashhad, Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 232 dental offices employing intraoral radiographic devices in 2015. Demographic data of the dentists, participation in educational courses, application of dosimeters, protection methods for patients and personnel, and the device features were recorded. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 19. Results: In this study, 22.9 of the radiography devices were equipped with digital systems. The application of the E-speed film and angle bisector technique was estimated at 77.1 and 79.7, respectively. Most dental offices did not use thyroid shields (61.6) and lead aprons (54.7). Among the methods of personnel protection, lead screen (47.4) and maintaining distance (30.2) were used more frequently compared to the other approaches. In 65 of the dental offices, quality control of the devices was performed every year. Mean score of compliance with the principles of protection was 42.9, and radiation protection was at a moderate level in 77 of the dental offices. Additionally, no significant association was observed between the observance of protection principles with gender and work experience of the dentists. Conclusion: Several radiographic devices are used for improving imaging quality and reducing the absorbed radiation dose in patients. Considering the moderate level of compliance with the principles of radiation protection in most of the studied dental offices in Mashhad, it is recommended that training courses be offered in this regard for the accurate monitoring of these principles in the application radiography devices in dental offices.

Key concepts: Radiation protection, Dental radiography, Lead apron, Medicine, Radiography, Medical physics, Dosimeter, Dentistry

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the Compliance with the Principles of Radiation Protection in the Dental Offices in Mashhad, Iran — Research Paper | ScholarLens