2024•University of Calgary Press eBooksRequires access

10 Stormy “Whethers”: Ethical Challenges of a Clinician in Academia

Donald W. Stewart

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

In order to consider the Supreme Court of Canada’s roles and functions, this article explores the interaction between judicial discretion and institutional strictures such as the Court’s size and appellate authority, chosen from a number of models. The author states and analyses the rationale for investing the Supreme Court with the power to preside over appeals arising out of all provincial appellate courts and regarding provincial matters, and argues it has become a supervisory tribunal rather than appellate court in the traditional sense. He discusses the formula for granting leave to appeal and the purpose of the Court for granting such leave. Finally, he considers how this function of the Court is affected by the kind of business that comes before it, the status of bare concurrences and the effect of the rule of law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to consider the Supreme Court of Canada’s roles and functions, this article explores the interaction between judicial discretion and institutional strictures such as the Court’s size and appellate authority, chosen from a number of models. The author states and analyses the rationale for investing the Supreme Court with the power to preside over appeals arising out of all provincial appellate courts and regarding provincial matters, and argues it has become a supervisory tribunal rather than appellate court in the traditional sense. He discusses the formula for granting leave to appeal and the purpose of the Court for granting such leave. Finally, he considers how this function of the Court is affected by the kind of business that comes before it, the status of bare concurrences and the effect of the rule of law.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to consider the Supreme Court of Canada’s roles and functions, this article explores the interaction between judicial discretion and institutional strictures such as the Court’s size and appellate authority, chosen from a number of models. The author states and analyses the rationale for investing the Supreme Court with the power to preside over appeals arising out of all provincial appellate courts and regarding provincial matters, and argues it has become a supervisory tribunal rather than appellate court in the traditional sense. He discusses the formula for granting leave to appeal and the purpose of the Court for granting such leave. Finally, he considers how this function of the Court is affected by the kind of business that comes before it, the status of bare concurrences and the effect of the rule of law.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Original jurisdiction, Political science, Court of record, Law of the case, Appeal, Tribunal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
10 Stormy “Whethers”: Ethical Challenges of a Clinician in Academia — Research Paper | ScholarLens