2019•Journal of the Endocrine SocietyOpen access

MON-LB055 A Single Center Experience of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) vs Sporadic Insulinoma: What Can We Learn and Where Are We Going?

Miho Itatani, Diala El‐Maouche, James M. Welch, Megan S Startzell, Craig S. Cochran, Roxanne Merkel, Aisha Tepede, Adel Mandl, Sunita Kishore Agarwal, Amit Tirosh, Samira Sadowski Veuthey, Naris Nilubol, William F. Simonds, Lee Scott Weinstein, Richard Chang, Phillip Görden, Jenny E. Blau

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Further characterization of insulinomas from MEN1 patients versus sporadic cases may help elucidate pathophysiological differences and improve future diagnostic algorithms. Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients with insulinoma were included (MEN1 between 1971-2019; sporadic between 1997-2019). Demographic, clinical, laboratory results including a supervised fast, imaging and intra-arterial calcium stimulation (CaStim) data were retrieved when available. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test, respectively. Results One hundred and thirteen patients were identified with insulinoma (69 women, median 44 years, range 13-78 years); of these, 27 patients had MEN1 (11 women, median 37 years, range 18-64 years). Patients with MEN1-related insulinomas sustained a significantly longer duration of the fast and had larger surgically resected tumors (29.73±15.32 vs 15.4±10.8 hours, p<0.001; and 3.2±1.3 vs 1.6±0.8 cm, p<0.001, respectively). In MEN1 patients, CT and MRI failed to localize a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in 3/15 (20%) and 2/11 (18%) of patients. CaStim localized 5/8 (63%) insulinomas in MEN1 patients versus 66/81 (81%) insulinomas in sporadic patients. Conclusion Insulinomas in MEN1 patients are larger and more difficult to localize. The role of insulinoma-specific imaging, including 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT, may improve localization sensitivity in MEN1 over CaStim. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. Abstracts presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Further characterization of insulinomas from MEN1 patients versus sporadic cases may help elucidate pathophysiological differences and improve future diagnostic algorithms. Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients with insulinoma were included (MEN1 between 1971-2019; sporadic between 1997-2019). Demographic, clinical, laboratory results including a supervised fast, imaging and intra-arterial calcium stimulation (CaStim) data were retrieved when available. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test, respectively. Results One hundred and thirteen patients were identified with insulinoma (69 women, median 44 years, range 13-78 years); of these, 27 patients had MEN1 (11 women, median 37 years, range 18-64 years). Patients with MEN1-related insulinomas sustained a significantly longer duration of the fast and had larger surgically resected tumors (29.73±15.32 vs 15.4±10.8 hours, p<0.001; and 3.2±1.3 vs 1.6±0.8 cm, p<0.001, respectively). In MEN1 patients, CT and MRI failed to localize a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in 3/15 (20%) and 2/11 (18%) of patients. CaStim localized 5/8 (63%) insulinomas in MEN1 patients versus 66/81 (81%) insulinomas in sporadic patients. Conclusion Insulinomas in MEN1 patients are larger and more difficult to localize. The role of insulinoma-specific imaging, including 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT, may improve localization sensitivity in MEN1 over CaStim. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. Abstracts presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Further characterization of insulinomas from MEN1 patients versus sporadic cases may help elucidate pathophysiological differences and improve future diagnostic algorithms. Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients with insulinoma were included (MEN1 between 1971-2019; sporadic between 1997-2019). Demographic, clinical, laboratory results including a supervised fast, imaging and intra-arterial calcium stimulation (CaStim) data were retrieved when available. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test, respectively. Results One hundred and thirteen patients were identified with insulinoma (69 women, median 44 years, range 13-78 years); of these, 27 patients had MEN1 (11 women, median 37 years, range 18-64 years). Patients with MEN1-related insulinomas sustained a significantly longer duration of the fast and had larger surgically resected tumors (29.73±15.32 vs 15.4±10.8 hours, p<0.001; and 3.2±1.3 vs 1.6±0.8 cm, p<0.001, respectively). In MEN1 patients, CT and MRI failed to localize a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in 3/15 (20%) and 2/11 (18%) of patients. CaStim localized 5/8 (63%) insulinomas in MEN1 patients versus 66/81 (81%) insulinomas in sporadic patients. Conclusion Insulinomas in MEN1 patients are larger and more difficult to localize. The role of insulinoma-specific imaging, including 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT, may improve localization sensitivity in MEN1 over CaStim. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. Abstracts presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.

Key concepts: MEN1, Insulinoma, Multiple endocrine neoplasia, Medicine, Exact test, Single Center, Gastrinoma, Mann–Whitney U test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MON-LB055 A Single Center Experience of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) vs Sporadic Insulinoma: What Can We Learn and Where Are We Going? — Research Paper | ScholarLens