2019•Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae BrunensisOpen access

Comparison of Different Texture Analysis for Soil Erodibility Calculations of Loamy and Sandy-Loam Soils in Moravian Regions

Miroslav Dumbrovský, Lucie Larišová, Veronika Sobotková, Martina Kulihová

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

The subject of this article is a comparison of results of soil texture analysis of loamy and sandy-loam soils for soil erodibilty calculation using the Casagrande areometric method and results obtained by the laser diffraction method. A comparison was made of 27 samples taken from the Větřkovice locality, and 18 samples taken from the Hustopeče locality. On the basis of laboratory analysis of the soil samples, curves of grain composition were plotted, and the soils were divided into grain-size groups according to the ratio of individual fractions. For comparison of the results, the soils' regression dependence, with linear, exponential, quadratic and polynomic trends were derived. Applying these different methods for determining soil texture may affect the determination of K factor values and the value of soil loss. The results show that the laser diffraction method provides higher values of % silt and % silty sand at both model sites. Using the K values determining from Casagrande method measuring can led to the underestimation of soil erodibility. This underestimation can be explained by a change in particle size distribution between the described methods used.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The subject of this article is a comparison of results of soil texture analysis of loamy and sandy-loam soils for soil erodibilty calculation using the Casagrande areometric method and results obtained by the laser diffraction method. A comparison was made of 27 samples taken from the Větřkovice locality, and 18 samples taken from the Hustopeče locality. On the basis of laboratory analysis of the soil samples, curves of grain composition were plotted, and the soils were divided into grain-size groups according to the ratio of individual fractions. For comparison of the results, the soils' regression dependence, with linear, exponential, quadratic and polynomic trends were derived. Applying these different methods for determining soil texture may affect the determination of K factor values and the value of soil loss. The results show that the laser diffraction method provides higher values of % silt and % silty sand at both model sites. Using the K values determining from Casagrande method measuring can led to the underestimation of soil erodibility. This underestimation can be explained by a change in particle size distribution between the described methods used.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The subject of this article is a comparison of results of soil texture analysis of loamy and sandy-loam soils for soil erodibilty calculation using the Casagrande areometric method and results obtained by the laser diffraction method. A comparison was made of 27 samples taken from the Větřkovice locality, and 18 samples taken from the Hustopeče locality. On the basis of laboratory analysis of the soil samples, curves of grain composition were plotted, and the soils were divided into grain-size groups according to the ratio of individual fractions. For comparison of the results, the soils' regression dependence, with linear, exponential, quadratic and polynomic trends were derived. Applying these different methods for determining soil texture may affect the determination of K factor values and the value of soil loss. The results show that the laser diffraction method provides higher values of % silt and % silty sand at both model sites. Using the K values determining from Casagrande method measuring can led to the underestimation of soil erodibility. This underestimation can be explained by a change in particle size distribution between the described methods used.

Key concepts: Loam, Soil texture, Soil water, Silt, Soil science, Particle-size distribution, Soil test, Texture (cosmology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Different Texture Analysis for Soil Erodibility Calculations of Loamy and Sandy-Loam Soils in Moravian Regions — Research Paper | ScholarLens