2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Hume’S Skepticism Concerning Reason

Robert J. Fogelin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The skepticism concerning induction calls into question all inferences from present and past experience to other experience. This chapter examines argument in detail later on, but for purposes it is sufficient to notice that David Hume intends his skepticism to be wholly unmitigated within its range of application. Surveying the faculties of the human mind, Hume raises skeptical doubts concerning the understanding, skeptical doubts concerning the senses, and he raises skeptical doubts concerning reason. Hume’s naturalistic conception of the mind is carried to the seat of reason. In a more famous part of the Treatise , Hume argues that causal inferences have no rational foundation; instead, they derive from a natural propensity of the mind to project past regularities into the future. The plain suggestion of this passage is that reasoning itself is another natural propensity. Presented with certain ideas, the mind is naturally led to believe that certain relations obtain among them. Hume’s naturalism runs very deep.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The skepticism concerning induction calls into question all inferences from present and past experience to other experience. This chapter examines argument in detail later on, but for purposes it is sufficient to notice that David Hume intends his skepticism to be wholly unmitigated within its range of application. Surveying the faculties of the human mind, Hume raises skeptical doubts concerning the understanding, skeptical doubts concerning the senses, and he raises skeptical doubts concerning reason. Hume’s naturalistic conception of the mind is carried to the seat of reason. In a more famous part of the Treatise , Hume argues that causal inferences have no rational foundation; instead, they derive from a natural propensity of the mind to project past regularities into the future. The plain suggestion of this passage is that reasoning itself is another natural propensity. Presented with certain ideas, the mind is naturally led to believe that certain relations obtain among them. Hume’s naturalism runs very deep.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The skepticism concerning induction calls into question all inferences from present and past experience to other experience. This chapter examines argument in detail later on, but for purposes it is sufficient to notice that David Hume intends his skepticism to be wholly unmitigated within its range of application. Surveying the faculties of the human mind, Hume raises skeptical doubts concerning the understanding, skeptical doubts concerning the senses, and he raises skeptical doubts concerning reason. Hume’s naturalistic conception of the mind is carried to the seat of reason. In a more famous part of the Treatise , Hume argues that causal inferences have no rational foundation; instead, they derive from a natural propensity of the mind to project past regularities into the future. The plain suggestion of this passage is that reasoning itself is another natural propensity. Presented with certain ideas, the mind is naturally led to believe that certain relations obtain among them. Hume’s naturalism runs very deep.

Key concepts: Skepticism, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hume’S Skepticism Concerning Reason — Research Paper | ScholarLens