2018UMS Library Center of Academic Activities (Universitas Surakarta)Open access

AN ANALYSIS OF TYPE AND PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN STUDENTS’ WRITING TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 6 SURAKARTA

Destie Kusumaningtias, M. Hum Endang Fauziati

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The reserch is about Corrective Feedback Analysis. The aims of this research are: 1) to describe the type of corrective feedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta, 2) to find out the purpose of corrective feedback. The data are taken from Teacher and the Students Second grade of SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta. The Method of collecting data in this research are Observation, Interview, and Students Work. The type of this research is desccriptive qualitative research. The researches identifies the types of corrective feedback by refering Teddick&Gortari theory and Karmin&Ivy theory for describe the function of corrective feedback, then describes the frequency of each type of corrective feedback by using table. The finding showed that the researcher found (42,85%) Repetition, (35,72%) Clarification Feedback, and (21,43%) Elicitation in Oral corrective feedback, while in written corrective feedback there are (72,85%) direct corrective feedback and (27,14%) Indirect corrective feedback. The result showed that there are three kinds of oral corrective fedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta used Clarification feedback, Repetition, and Elicitation. In the written corrective feedback there are two kinds of feedback that used by the teacher, there are Direct and Indirect corrective feedback. The result also show that teacher apply \n2 \ncorrective feedback to help in checking students assignment and improving students writing ability.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The reserch is about Corrective Feedback Analysis. The aims of this research are: 1) to describe the type of corrective feedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta, 2) to find out the purpose of corrective feedback. The data are taken from Teacher and the Students Second grade of SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta. The Method of collecting data in this research are Observation, Interview, and Students Work. The type of this research is desccriptive qualitative research. The researches identifies the types of corrective feedback by refering Teddick&Gortari theory and Karmin&Ivy theory for describe the function of corrective feedback, then describes the frequency of each type of corrective feedback by using table. The finding showed that the researcher found (42,85%) Repetition, (35,72%) Clarification Feedback, and (21,43%) Elicitation in Oral corrective feedback, while in written corrective feedback there are (72,85%) direct corrective feedback and (27,14%) Indirect corrective feedback. The result showed that there are three kinds of oral corrective fedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta used Clarification feedback, Repetition, and Elicitation. In the written corrective feedback there are two kinds of feedback that used by the teacher, there are Direct and Indirect corrective feedback. The result also show that teacher apply \n2 \ncorrective feedback to help in checking students assignment and improving students writing ability.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The reserch is about Corrective Feedback Analysis. The aims of this research are: 1) to describe the type of corrective feedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta, 2) to find out the purpose of corrective feedback. The data are taken from Teacher and the Students Second grade of SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta. The Method of collecting data in this research are Observation, Interview, and Students Work. The type of this research is desccriptive qualitative research. The researches identifies the types of corrective feedback by refering Teddick&Gortari theory and Karmin&Ivy theory for describe the function of corrective feedback, then describes the frequency of each type of corrective feedback by using table. The finding showed that the researcher found (42,85%) Repetition, (35,72%) Clarification Feedback, and (21,43%) Elicitation in Oral corrective feedback, while in written corrective feedback there are (72,85%) direct corrective feedback and (27,14%) Indirect corrective feedback. The result showed that there are three kinds of oral corrective fedback that used by the teacher in SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Surakarta used Clarification feedback, Repetition, and Elicitation. In the written corrective feedback there are two kinds of feedback that used by the teacher, there are Direct and Indirect corrective feedback. The result also show that teacher apply \n2 \ncorrective feedback to help in checking students assignment and improving students writing ability.

Key concepts: Corrective feedback, Repetition (rhetorical device), Psychology, Computer science, Table (database), Mathematics education, Linguistics, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AN ANALYSIS OF TYPE AND PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN STUDENTS’ WRITING TEXT: A CASE STUDY AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 6 SURAKARTA — Research Paper | ScholarLens