Multiple-Group Invariance with Categorical Outcomes Using Updated Guidelines: An Illustration Using M plus and the lavaan/semTools Packages
Dubravka Svetina, Leslie Rutkowski, David Rutkowski
Abstract
Dubravka Svetina, Leslie Rutkowski, David Rutkowski
Abstract
Meaningful comparisons of means or relationships between latent constructs across groups require evidence that measurement is equivalent across the studied groups– a property known as measurement equivalence or invariance (ME/I). Methods typically involve an evaluation of increasingly stringent models via confirmatory factor analysis, a typical assumption of which is continuous observed variables. When that assumption is not met – as is often the case in many surveys – alternative methods that directly model the categorical nature of the data exist. Although well established, categorical ME/I models pose a number of complexities and various recommendations for their evaluation. To that end, we describe the current state of categorical ME/I and demonstrate an up-to-date method for model identification and invariance testing. In the tutorial, we exemplify a common approach to establishing ME/I via multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis using Mplus and the lavaan and semTools packages in R.
OpenAlex reports 440 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Meaningful comparisons of means or relationships between latent constructs across groups require evidence that measurement is equivalent across the studied groups– a property known as measurement equivalence or invariance (ME/I). Methods typically involve an evaluation of increasingly stringent models via confirmatory factor analysis, a typical assumption of which is continuous observed variables. When that assumption is not met – as is often the case in many surveys – alternative methods that directly model the categorical nature of the data exist. Although well established, categorical ME/I models pose a number of complexities and various recommendations for their evaluation. To that end, we describe the current state of categorical ME/I and demonstrate an up-to-date method for model identification and invariance testing. In the tutorial, we exemplify a common approach to establishing ME/I via multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis using Mplus and the lavaan and semTools packages in R.
Key concepts: Categorical variable, Measurement invariance, Equivalence (formal languages), Confirmatory factor analysis, Latent variable, Mathematics, Factor analysis, Property (philosophy)