Model Performances Evaluated for Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients Prediction at 298.15 K
Thomas Brouwer, Boelo Schuur
Abstract
Thomas Brouwer, Boelo Schuur
Abstract
Abstract The infinite dilution activity coefficient (γi∞) is often applied to characterize solvent–solute interactions, and, when accurately predicted, it can also serve as an early-stage solvent selection tool. Ample data are available on the use of a variety of models, which complicates decision making on which model to apply and when to apply it. A comparative study was performed for eight predictive models at 298.15 K, including the Hildebrand parameter and the Hansen solubility parameters. Also, three group contribution methods based on UNIFAC, COSMO-RS, the Abraham model, and the MOSCED model were evaluated. Overall, the MOSCED model and the Abraham model are most accurate for molecular solvents and ionic liquids, respectively, with average relative deviations of 16.2% ± 1.35% and 65.1% ± 4.50%. Therefore, cautious decision making based on predicted γi∞ in ionic liquids should always be done, because of the expected significant deviations. A MOSCED model for ionic liquids could be a potential approach for higher accuracy.
OpenAlex reports 64 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The infinite dilution activity coefficient (γi∞) is often applied to characterize solvent–solute interactions, and, when accurately predicted, it can also serve as an early-stage solvent selection tool. Ample data are available on the use of a variety of models, which complicates decision making on which model to apply and when to apply it. A comparative study was performed for eight predictive models at 298.15 K, including the Hildebrand parameter and the Hansen solubility parameters. Also, three group contribution methods based on UNIFAC, COSMO-RS, the Abraham model, and the MOSCED model were evaluated. Overall, the MOSCED model and the Abraham model are most accurate for molecular solvents and ionic liquids, respectively, with average relative deviations of 16.2% ± 1.35% and 65.1% ± 4.50%. Therefore, cautious decision making based on predicted γi∞ in ionic liquids should always be done, because of the expected significant deviations. A MOSCED model for ionic liquids could be a potential approach for higher accuracy.
Key concepts: UNIFAC, Activity coefficient, Dilution, Thermodynamics, Ionic liquid, Solubility, Solvent, Group contribution method