2018•MultitudesRequires access

The democratic question

Albert Ogien

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

If the system of representative government has lost much of its legitimacy, it is because people who experience ordinary ways of exercising the rights and duties attached to their citizenship have developed a conception of politics that makes it possible to make judgements about the action of public authorities, to dispute the way in which they insure the common good and to claim new rights. Instead of considering the disappearance of the blind consent of the governed as a proof of infantilism or irrationality, it must be seen as an extension of the vigilance of citizens towards those who represent them. This vigilance derives its legitimacy from the idea of democracy as a form of life. The democratic question, as it is posed today, is that of the recognition of the full political capacity of the citizens, to which anti democracy thinking stubbornly opposes. It is to this thought that we must renounce.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

If the system of representative government has lost much of its legitimacy, it is because people who experience ordinary ways of exercising the rights and duties attached to their citizenship have developed a conception of politics that makes it possible to make judgements about the action of public authorities, to dispute the way in which they insure the common good and to claim new rights. Instead of considering the disappearance of the blind consent of the governed as a proof of infantilism or irrationality, it must be seen as an extension of the vigilance of citizens towards those who represent them. This vigilance derives its legitimacy from the idea of democracy as a form of life. The democratic question, as it is posed today, is that of the recognition of the full political capacity of the citizens, to which anti democracy thinking stubbornly opposes. It is to this thought that we must renounce.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

If the system of representative government has lost much of its legitimacy, it is because people who experience ordinary ways of exercising the rights and duties attached to their citizenship have developed a conception of politics that makes it possible to make judgements about the action of public authorities, to dispute the way in which they insure the common good and to claim new rights. Instead of considering the disappearance of the blind consent of the governed as a proof of infantilism or irrationality, it must be seen as an extension of the vigilance of citizens towards those who represent them. This vigilance derives its legitimacy from the idea of democracy as a form of life. The democratic question, as it is posed today, is that of the recognition of the full political capacity of the citizens, to which anti democracy thinking stubbornly opposes. It is to this thought that we must renounce.

Key concepts: Legitimacy, Democracy, Irrationality, Citizenship, Politics, Law, Sociology, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source