O liberalismo na economia política clássica
João Luiz Machado Paschoal
Abstract
João Luiz Machado Paschoal
Abstract
In modern economic theory, liberalism is described by such aspects that put it away from the liberalism proposed in the first classical economic theoretical formulations, when this trend saw in politics and philosophy the best way in order to describe the relationship between society and economic behavior. Now it is pictured as a system where it should have the least governmental intervention in the economy, through market deregulation, freedom and a blind belief over the forces of the free Market, whereas classical economic liberalism was described particularly different. Classical liberalism, on the other hand, constitutes itself as a composition of different ways of explaining the world: classical liberalism saw in government and institutions, its first row to achieve economic and social development, regarding the human being as one part of the hole, the society. In classical liberalism, whose basis lies in the rupture of the human reason from the chains of religion philosophy on Europe between the 16th and 17th century, the actor – as the individual – places himself as what he should be: the member of something bigger than himself, that is, the society. Although structuralisms were not formulated before the 19th century, it was clear that in the dawn of the liberal thought that a group of moral and ethical characteristics would be the values, which would support the rules of formal and informal institutions.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In modern economic theory, liberalism is described by such aspects that put it away from the liberalism proposed in the first classical economic theoretical formulations, when this trend saw in politics and philosophy the best way in order to describe the relationship between society and economic behavior. Now it is pictured as a system where it should have the least governmental intervention in the economy, through market deregulation, freedom and a blind belief over the forces of the free Market, whereas classical economic liberalism was described particularly different. Classical liberalism, on the other hand, constitutes itself as a composition of different ways of explaining the world: classical liberalism saw in government and institutions, its first row to achieve economic and social development, regarding the human being as one part of the hole, the society. In classical liberalism, whose basis lies in the rupture of the human reason from the chains of religion philosophy on Europe between the 16th and 17th century, the actor – as the individual – places himself as what he should be: the member of something bigger than himself, that is, the society. Although structuralisms were not formulated before the 19th century, it was clear that in the dawn of the liberal thought that a group of moral and ethical characteristics would be the values, which would support the rules of formal and informal institutions.
Key concepts: Liberalism, Economic liberalism, Classical liberalism, Economic freedom, Politics, Economic interventionism, Order (exchange), Deregulation