2018RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development

Feng Wen, Donald R. Lessard, Bruce Cameron, Edward F. Crawley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA), supported by multiple software tools, has become an accepted methodology to document, visualize and interpret relationships among participants in an organization, community or other social network. Participants are represented as nodes in the network, with various kinds of social interactions _ for example, advice seeking or knowledge sharing _ represented by unidirectional or bidirectional arcs or “edges” connecting the nodes. The stakeholders in a large infrastructure project are drawn from public, private and civic sectors, and the stakeholders in PPP projects become more or less salient at different times during the life cycle of a decades-long public_private partnership (PPP) concession. This chapter extends social network analysis for large projects such as PPPs to consider both direct and indirect, open or closed social and economic value-flows and combines their effects in terms of the utility of each exchange relationship to the focal stakeholder. This allows a given stakeholder _ for example, a public agency, concessionaire or civic organization _ to assess its power relative to other project stakeholders, and to identify possible value exchanges with other participants to align their goals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Social network analysis (SNA), supported by multiple software tools, has become an accepted methodology to document, visualize and interpret relationships among participants in an organization, community or other social network. Participants are represented as nodes in the network, with various kinds of social interactions _ for example, advice seeking or knowledge sharing _ represented by unidirectional or bidirectional arcs or “edges” connecting the nodes. The stakeholders in a large infrastructure project are drawn from public, private and civic sectors, and the stakeholders in PPP projects become more or less salient at different times during the life cycle of a decades-long public_private partnership (PPP) concession. This chapter extends social network analysis for large projects such as PPPs to consider both direct and indirect, open or closed social and economic value-flows and combines their effects in terms of the utility of each exchange relationship to the focal stakeholder. This allows a given stakeholder _ for example, a public agency, concessionaire or civic organization _ to assess its power relative to other project stakeholders, and to identify possible value exchanges with other participants to align their goals.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Social network analysis (SNA), supported by multiple software tools, has become an accepted methodology to document, visualize and interpret relationships among participants in an organization, community or other social network. Participants are represented as nodes in the network, with various kinds of social interactions _ for example, advice seeking or knowledge sharing _ represented by unidirectional or bidirectional arcs or “edges” connecting the nodes. The stakeholders in a large infrastructure project are drawn from public, private and civic sectors, and the stakeholders in PPP projects become more or less salient at different times during the life cycle of a decades-long public_private partnership (PPP) concession. This chapter extends social network analysis for large projects such as PPPs to consider both direct and indirect, open or closed social and economic value-flows and combines their effects in terms of the utility of each exchange relationship to the focal stakeholder. This allows a given stakeholder _ for example, a public agency, concessionaire or civic organization _ to assess its power relative to other project stakeholders, and to identify possible value exchanges with other participants to align their goals.

Key concepts: Business, Public relations, Public administration, Economic growth, Political science, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens