Between Orthodox Theism and Materialist Atheism
Fiona Ellis
Abstract
Fiona Ellis
Abstract
Tim Mulgan’s aim is to explore two alternatives that occupy a middle ground between orthodox theism and atheism, and are intended to be preferable to either of these extremes. Ananthropocentric theism posits a morally perfect creator God who has no interest in the fate of individual human beings, but the position incorporates its own “nonhuman-centered non-natural values.” Axiarchism is non-theistic in the sense that it involves reference to impersonal goodness rather than to a personal God, and Mulgan adds to it an ananthropocentric dimension as a way of dealing with the problem of evil. The chapter argues that defending a plausible middle ground in this context is a central philosophical task, and that it is inextricably tied up with the question of value. It explains how expansive naturalism makes room for a loving God and offers some reasons for favoring it over Mulgan’s position.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Tim Mulgan’s aim is to explore two alternatives that occupy a middle ground between orthodox theism and atheism, and are intended to be preferable to either of these extremes. Ananthropocentric theism posits a morally perfect creator God who has no interest in the fate of individual human beings, but the position incorporates its own “nonhuman-centered non-natural values.” Axiarchism is non-theistic in the sense that it involves reference to impersonal goodness rather than to a personal God, and Mulgan adds to it an ananthropocentric dimension as a way of dealing with the problem of evil. The chapter argues that defending a plausible middle ground in this context is a central philosophical task, and that it is inextricably tied up with the question of value. It explains how expansive naturalism makes room for a loving God and offers some reasons for favoring it over Mulgan’s position.
Key concepts: Theism, Materialism, Atheism, Philosophy, Religious studies, Epistemology