2019Journal of VitreoRetinal DiseasesRequires access

Clinical Effectiveness of Switching Between Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Treatment of Neovascular AMD: US Real-World Outcomes

Pravin U. Dugel, Raymond Griner, Alberto Ferreira, F Milnes, Andrew Lotery

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to examine visual acuity (VA) outcomes and treatment patterns in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switching between ranibizumab and aflibercept in routine clinical practice. Methods: Electronic medical records were used to identify nAMD eyes receiving ranibizumab or aflibercept with 12 months’ follow-up since switching antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. The primary outcome compared mean change in VA between switch and Month 12 to test the noninferiority of switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept vs aflibercept to ranibizumab. Comparing the number of injection/noninjection visits was the key secondary objective. Results: A total of 269 eyes switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept and 83 switching from aflibercept to ranibizumab were included. The mean change in VA (letters) after 12 months in eyes switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept, and from aflibercept to ranibizumab, was –1.56 and 0.21, respectively ( P = .65). The adjusted difference (95% confidence interval) of mean change at Month 12 was 1.29 (–2.97 to 5.55; P = .55), confirming the noninferiority of ranibizumab. The mean (±SD) number of injections during follow-up was 8.67 (±2.63) for eyes switching from aflibercept to ranibizumab and 7.79 (±2.77) for ranibizumab to aflibercept ( P = .01). Conclusions: Switching between anti-VEGFs is not associated with clinically relevant differences in VA at 12 months in routine clinical practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to examine visual acuity (VA) outcomes and treatment patterns in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switching between ranibizumab and aflibercept in routine clinical practice. Methods: Electronic medical records were used to identify nAMD eyes receiving ranibizumab or aflibercept with 12 months’ follow-up since switching antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. The primary outcome compared mean change in VA between switch and Month 12 to test the noninferiority of switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept vs aflibercept to ranibizumab. Comparing the number of injection/noninjection visits was the key secondary objective. Results: A total of 269 eyes switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept and 83 switching from aflibercept to ranibizumab were included. The mean change in VA (letters) after 12 months in eyes switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept, and from aflibercept to ranibizumab, was –1.56 and 0.21, respectively ( P = .65). The adjusted difference (95% confidence interval) of mean change at Month 12 was 1.29 (–2.97 to 5.55; P = .55), confirming the noninferiority of ranibizumab. The mean (±SD) number of injections during follow-up was 8.67 (±2.63) for eyes switching from aflibercept to ranibizumab and 7.79 (±2.77) for ranibizumab to aflibercept ( P = .01). Conclusions: Switching between anti-VEGFs is not associated with clinically relevant differences in VA at 12 months in routine clinical practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to examine visual acuity (VA) outcomes and treatment patterns in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switching between ranibizumab and aflibercept in routine clinical practice. Methods: Electronic medical records were used to identify nAMD eyes receiving ranibizumab or aflibercept with 12 months’ follow-up since switching antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. The primary outcome compared mean change in VA between switch and Month 12 to test the noninferiority of switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept vs aflibercept to ranibizumab. Comparing the number of injection/noninjection visits was the key secondary objective. Results: A total of 269 eyes switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept and 83 switching from aflibercept to ranibizumab were included. The mean change in VA (letters) after 12 months in eyes switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept, and from aflibercept to ranibizumab, was –1.56 and 0.21, respectively ( P = .65). The adjusted difference (95% confidence interval) of mean change at Month 12 was 1.29 (–2.97 to 5.55; P = .55), confirming the noninferiority of ranibizumab. The mean (±SD) number of injections during follow-up was 8.67 (±2.63) for eyes switching from aflibercept to ranibizumab and 7.79 (±2.77) for ranibizumab to aflibercept ( P = .01). Conclusions: Switching between anti-VEGFs is not associated with clinically relevant differences in VA at 12 months in routine clinical practice.

Key concepts: Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, Medicine, Macular degeneration, Ophthalmology, Visual acuity, Bevacizumab, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Effectiveness of Switching Between Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Treatment of Neovascular AMD: US Real-World Outcomes — Research Paper | ScholarLens