2019•The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Disentangling the contribution of head shadow, loudness summation, and binaural unmasking to spatial release from masking in children

Z. Ellen Peng, Ruth Y. Litovsky

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Segregating target speech from noise is crucial for children’s ability to communicate effectively in everyday environments. Past research clearly shows that when target sources are spatially separated from maskers, compared with target-masker being co-located, children as young as 2–3 years old demonstrate improved speech understanding. This effect is known as spatial release from masking (SRM). Generally, studies have used free-field or dichotic listening; hence, the contributions of head shadow, loudness summation, and binaural unmasking to SRM are unknown in children. This study aimed to quantify these factors in virtual auditory space. By varying the target-masker spatial configurations (co-located versus separated) and ear conditions (monaural versus binaural), speech understanding benefit was defined as improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio to achieve an accuracy of 50%. Results from 29 children with normal hearing (6–15 years old) show that head shadow cues are dominant in providing benefit, followed by binaural unmasking. Loudness summation, through increased intensity by listening with both ears, provided little to no benefit. No age effects were found. Results also suggest a re-balancing between cues depending on listening strategies adopted by children. For example, children who relied more on binaural unmasking received less benefit for speech understanding from head shadow. [Work supported by NIH-NIDCD.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Segregating target speech from noise is crucial for children’s ability to communicate effectively in everyday environments. Past research clearly shows that when target sources are spatially separated from maskers, compared with target-masker being co-located, children as young as 2–3 years old demonstrate improved speech understanding. This effect is known as spatial release from masking (SRM). Generally, studies have used free-field or dichotic listening; hence, the contributions of head shadow, loudness summation, and binaural unmasking to SRM are unknown in children. This study aimed to quantify these factors in virtual auditory space. By varying the target-masker spatial configurations (co-located versus separated) and ear conditions (monaural versus binaural), speech understanding benefit was defined as improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio to achieve an accuracy of 50%. Results from 29 children with normal hearing (6–15 years old) show that head shadow cues are dominant in providing benefit, followed by binaural unmasking. Loudness summation, through increased intensity by listening with both ears, provided little to no benefit. No age effects were found. Results also suggest a re-balancing between cues depending on listening strategies adopted by children. For example, children who relied more on binaural unmasking received less benefit for speech understanding from head shadow. [Work supported by NIH-NIDCD.]

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Segregating target speech from noise is crucial for children’s ability to communicate effectively in everyday environments. Past research clearly shows that when target sources are spatially separated from maskers, compared with target-masker being co-located, children as young as 2–3 years old demonstrate improved speech understanding. This effect is known as spatial release from masking (SRM). Generally, studies have used free-field or dichotic listening; hence, the contributions of head shadow, loudness summation, and binaural unmasking to SRM are unknown in children. This study aimed to quantify these factors in virtual auditory space. By varying the target-masker spatial configurations (co-located versus separated) and ear conditions (monaural versus binaural), speech understanding benefit was defined as improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio to achieve an accuracy of 50%. Results from 29 children with normal hearing (6–15 years old) show that head shadow cues are dominant in providing benefit, followed by binaural unmasking. Loudness summation, through increased intensity by listening with both ears, provided little to no benefit. No age effects were found. Results also suggest a re-balancing between cues depending on listening strategies adopted by children. For example, children who relied more on binaural unmasking received less benefit for speech understanding from head shadow. [Work supported by NIH-NIDCD.]

Key concepts: Binaural recording, Monaural, Loudness, Active listening, Dichotic listening, Audiology, Masking (illustration), Head (geology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Disentangling the contribution of head shadow, loudness summation, and binaural unmasking to spatial release from masking in children — Research Paper | ScholarLens