Experimental Investigation of a High-lift Low-drag Aerofoil. Report no. 6802
F. H. Kelling
Abstract
Open-access reader
F. H. Kelling
Abstract
Open-access reader
One of a series of low-drag aerofoils (1) Designated GU 25-5(11) 8 was selected for low speed wind tunnel testing at Reynolds numbers around half a million. Coefficients of lift, drag and pitching moment were obtained for a range of incidence. The maximum section lift coefficient obtained was 1.93 and the minimum profile drag coefficient was 0.0112. Results compared favourably with those deduced theoretically. The addition of a boundary layer trip to the upper surface caused the profile drag to decrease at some incidences. At the design lift coefficient of 1.4, the ratio of lift to profile drag was 108 at a Reynolds number of 0.63 million. The addition of an extended, sealed, flat-plate flap (with a chord one tenth that of the aerofoil) at the trailing edge of the aerofoil gave favourable results. A maximum ratio of lift to profile drag of 116 was obtained at a lift coefficient of 1.8 with a flap deflection of 17.8 degrees, while the maximum lift coefficient achieved was 2.30.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
One of a series of low-drag aerofoils (1) Designated GU 25-5(11) 8 was selected for low speed wind tunnel testing at Reynolds numbers around half a million. Coefficients of lift, drag and pitching moment were obtained for a range of incidence. The maximum section lift coefficient obtained was 1.93 and the minimum profile drag coefficient was 0.0112. Results compared favourably with those deduced theoretically. The addition of a boundary layer trip to the upper surface caused the profile drag to decrease at some incidences. At the design lift coefficient of 1.4, the ratio of lift to profile drag was 108 at a Reynolds number of 0.63 million. The addition of an extended, sealed, flat-plate flap (with a chord one tenth that of the aerofoil) at the trailing edge of the aerofoil gave favourable results. A maximum ratio of lift to profile drag of 116 was obtained at a lift coefficient of 1.8 with a flap deflection of 17.8 degrees, while the maximum lift coefficient achieved was 2.30.
Key concepts: Airfoil, Zero-lift drag coefficient, Lift coefficient, Drag coefficient, Lift-to-drag ratio, Drag, Reynolds number, Lift-induced drag