2019Journal of Medical MicrobiologyRequires access

Existence of multiple SCCmec elements in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Niveditha Nagasundaram, Sujatha Sistla

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be classified into hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) and community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), based on the associated epidemiological risk factors and their SCCmec types. We therefore studied the diversity and distribution of SCCmec elements among MRSA isolates in our region and also evaluated SCCmec typing as a tool for the classification of MRSA. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred isolates of MRSA obtained from various clinical specimens were included. The clinical and demographic details of the patients and the epidemiological risk factors for MRSA acquisition were documented. Multiplex PCR was optimized for all the major SCCmec types (I to V). Subtyping of SCCmec type IV (IVb, IVc, IVd, IVh) was carried out by simplex PCR. RESULTS: Based on epidemiological criteria, CA-MRSA constituted 57 % (114/200) of the the test isolates and HA-MRSA made up 43 % (86/200). The predominant SCCmec type found in our study was type III (62%), followed by type V (52.5%) and type I (47.5%), while type II was carried by a single isolate. Of the 200 isolates, 118 carried multiple SCCmec types and 3 were non-typable. CONCLUSION: The existence of multiple SCCmec types in individual MRSA isolates resulted in our inability to categorize many of these isolates as either CA-MRSA or HA-MRSA as defined by the SCCmec type criterion. LIMITATION: The major limitation of the study was that the SCC mec element of MRSA isolates exhibiting multiple types was not sequenced and hence this finding could not be confirmed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be classified into hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) and community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), based on the associated epidemiological risk factors and their SCCmec types. We therefore studied the diversity and distribution of SCCmec elements among MRSA isolates in our region and also evaluated SCCmec typing as a tool for the classification of MRSA. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred isolates of MRSA obtained from various clinical specimens were included. The clinical and demographic details of the patients and the epidemiological risk factors for MRSA acquisition were documented. Multiplex PCR was optimized for all the major SCCmec types (I to V). Subtyping of SCCmec type IV (IVb, IVc, IVd, IVh) was carried out by simplex PCR. RESULTS: Based on epidemiological criteria, CA-MRSA constituted 57 % (114/200) of the the test isolates and HA-MRSA made up 43 % (86/200). The predominant SCCmec type found in our study was type III (62%), followed by type V (52.5%) and type I (47.5%), while type II was carried by a single isolate. Of the 200 isolates, 118 carried multiple SCCmec types and 3 were non-typable. CONCLUSION: The existence of multiple SCCmec types in individual MRSA isolates resulted in our inability to categorize many of these isolates as either CA-MRSA or HA-MRSA as defined by the SCCmec type criterion. LIMITATION: The major limitation of the study was that the SCC mec element of MRSA isolates exhibiting multiple types was not sequenced and hence this finding could not be confirmed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be classified into hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) and community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), based on the associated epidemiological risk factors and their SCCmec types. We therefore studied the diversity and distribution of SCCmec elements among MRSA isolates in our region and also evaluated SCCmec typing as a tool for the classification of MRSA. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred isolates of MRSA obtained from various clinical specimens were included. The clinical and demographic details of the patients and the epidemiological risk factors for MRSA acquisition were documented. Multiplex PCR was optimized for all the major SCCmec types (I to V). Subtyping of SCCmec type IV (IVb, IVc, IVd, IVh) was carried out by simplex PCR. RESULTS: Based on epidemiological criteria, CA-MRSA constituted 57 % (114/200) of the the test isolates and HA-MRSA made up 43 % (86/200). The predominant SCCmec type found in our study was type III (62%), followed by type V (52.5%) and type I (47.5%), while type II was carried by a single isolate. Of the 200 isolates, 118 carried multiple SCCmec types and 3 were non-typable. CONCLUSION: The existence of multiple SCCmec types in individual MRSA isolates resulted in our inability to categorize many of these isolates as either CA-MRSA or HA-MRSA as defined by the SCCmec type criterion. LIMITATION: The major limitation of the study was that the SCC mec element of MRSA isolates exhibiting multiple types was not sequenced and hence this finding could not be confirmed.

Key concepts: SCCmec, Staphylococcus aureus, Subtyping, Microbiology, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Typing, Biology, Multiplex polymerase chain reaction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Existence of multiple SCCmec elements in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — Research Paper | ScholarLens