2019Hematological OncologyRequires access

Impact of 2016 WHO diagnosis of early and overt primary myelofibrosis on presentation and outcome of 232 patients treated with ruxolitinib

Francesca Palandri, Giuseppe A. Palumbo, Elisabetta Abruzzese, Alessandra Iurlo, Nicola Polverelli, Elena Maria Elli, Massimiliano Bonifacio, Micaela Bergamaschi, Bruno Martino, Mario Tiribelli, Giulia Benevolo, Alessia Tieghi, Nicola Sgherza, Alessandro Isidori, Gianni Binotto, Monica Crugnola, Florian H. Heidel, Francesco Cavazzini, Costanza Bosi, Giuseppe Auteri, Daniele Cattaneo, Robin Foà, Roberto M. Lemoli, Antonio Cuneo, Mauro Krampera, Daniela Bartoletti, Michèle Cavo, Nicola Vianelli, Massimo Breccia, Roberto Latagliata

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The 2016 WHO criteria identified early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) as an individual entity with milder clinical features and better outcome compared with overt PMF. Here, we compared early and overt PMF patients treated with ruxolitinib in terms of baseline clinical/laboratory characteristics, response, and toxicity to treatment. We observed that early-PMF patients achieve better and more stable spleen and symptoms responses, with significantly lower rates of hematological toxicities. No differences in overall and leukemia-free survival were detected between the two cohorts. The application of 2016 WHO criteria is crucial to identify those PMF patients who deserve a stricter monitoring during treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The 2016 WHO criteria identified early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) as an individual entity with milder clinical features and better outcome compared with overt PMF. Here, we compared early and overt PMF patients treated with ruxolitinib in terms of baseline clinical/laboratory characteristics, response, and toxicity to treatment. We observed that early-PMF patients achieve better and more stable spleen and symptoms responses, with significantly lower rates of hematological toxicities. No differences in overall and leukemia-free survival were detected between the two cohorts. The application of 2016 WHO criteria is crucial to identify those PMF patients who deserve a stricter monitoring during treatment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The 2016 WHO criteria identified early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) as an individual entity with milder clinical features and better outcome compared with overt PMF. Here, we compared early and overt PMF patients treated with ruxolitinib in terms of baseline clinical/laboratory characteristics, response, and toxicity to treatment. We observed that early-PMF patients achieve better and more stable spleen and symptoms responses, with significantly lower rates of hematological toxicities. No differences in overall and leukemia-free survival were detected between the two cohorts. The application of 2016 WHO criteria is crucial to identify those PMF patients who deserve a stricter monitoring during treatment.

Key concepts: Ruxolitinib, Myelofibrosis, Medicine, Myeloproliferative neoplasm, Internal medicine, Overall survival, Oncology, Pediatrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of 2016 WHO diagnosis of early and overt primary myelofibrosis on presentation and outcome of 232 patients treated with ruxolitinib — Research Paper | ScholarLens