2019Unpublished venueRequires access

What's Wrong with Secularization?

Benjamin Schewel

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter argues that the contemporary academic discourse on modern religion pivots seven basic claims about what went wrong with classical secularization theory. The first two claims include: the process of secularization is more complex than classical secularization theory envisioned and secularization theory describes a limited phase of modern history, but fails to make sense of global transformations. The next two claims include: the forces identified by secularization theorists do not bring about religion's marginalization and decline, but rather its transformation; secularization theory overlooks religion's intimate involvement in modernity's historical formation; and secularization theory actually describes one phase of a broader religious cycle. The last three claims include: scholarly concepts of 'religion' and the 'secular' have been shaped by secularization theory and purely secular accounts of human affairs hinder the ability to navigate and respond to the challenges facing contemporary society.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter argues that the contemporary academic discourse on modern religion pivots seven basic claims about what went wrong with classical secularization theory. The first two claims include: the process of secularization is more complex than classical secularization theory envisioned and secularization theory describes a limited phase of modern history, but fails to make sense of global transformations. The next two claims include: the forces identified by secularization theorists do not bring about religion's marginalization and decline, but rather its transformation; secularization theory overlooks religion's intimate involvement in modernity's historical formation; and secularization theory actually describes one phase of a broader religious cycle. The last three claims include: scholarly concepts of 'religion' and the 'secular' have been shaped by secularization theory and purely secular accounts of human affairs hinder the ability to navigate and respond to the challenges facing contemporary society.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter argues that the contemporary academic discourse on modern religion pivots seven basic claims about what went wrong with classical secularization theory. The first two claims include: the process of secularization is more complex than classical secularization theory envisioned and secularization theory describes a limited phase of modern history, but fails to make sense of global transformations. The next two claims include: the forces identified by secularization theorists do not bring about religion's marginalization and decline, but rather its transformation; secularization theory overlooks religion's intimate involvement in modernity's historical formation; and secularization theory actually describes one phase of a broader religious cycle. The last three claims include: scholarly concepts of 'religion' and the 'secular' have been shaped by secularization theory and purely secular accounts of human affairs hinder the ability to navigate and respond to the challenges facing contemporary society.

Key concepts: Secularization, Modernity, Sociology, Secular state, Epistemology, Political science, Philosophy, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What's Wrong with Secularization? — Research Paper | ScholarLens