2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Design and Practice

Harry Daniels, Andrew Stables, Hau Ming Tse, Sarah L. Cox

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Architecture is a deeply social practice, but in contemporary architecture, the social dimension of design and analysis is often absent. The delivery architects designed innovative open-plan spaces that aimed to facilitate different styles of learning in line with the educational vision. Financial pressures on design and construction projects often involve ‘value engineering’ in which designs are substantially changed to meet budgetary requirements at different points in the construction process. Different patterns of collaboration during value engineering processes can lead to very different outcomes. Where object motives of time and budget held by contractors prevail, then occupiers may be very dissatisfied with outcomes. The suitability of the building for schools’ pedagogic practices as they change through time will be determined by the building’s potential to adapt to the school’s changing spatial needs and the school understands of the building’s design principles.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Architecture is a deeply social practice, but in contemporary architecture, the social dimension of design and analysis is often absent. The delivery architects designed innovative open-plan spaces that aimed to facilitate different styles of learning in line with the educational vision. Financial pressures on design and construction projects often involve ‘value engineering’ in which designs are substantially changed to meet budgetary requirements at different points in the construction process. Different patterns of collaboration during value engineering processes can lead to very different outcomes. Where object motives of time and budget held by contractors prevail, then occupiers may be very dissatisfied with outcomes. The suitability of the building for schools’ pedagogic practices as they change through time will be determined by the building’s potential to adapt to the school’s changing spatial needs and the school understands of the building’s design principles.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Architecture is a deeply social practice, but in contemporary architecture, the social dimension of design and analysis is often absent. The delivery architects designed innovative open-plan spaces that aimed to facilitate different styles of learning in line with the educational vision. Financial pressures on design and construction projects often involve ‘value engineering’ in which designs are substantially changed to meet budgetary requirements at different points in the construction process. Different patterns of collaboration during value engineering processes can lead to very different outcomes. Where object motives of time and budget held by contractors prevail, then occupiers may be very dissatisfied with outcomes. The suitability of the building for schools’ pedagogic practices as they change through time will be determined by the building’s potential to adapt to the school’s changing spatial needs and the school understands of the building’s design principles.

Key concepts: Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Design and Practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens