2019Amicus CuriaeOpen access

Jury direction – an antipodean experiment

Mark L. Weinberg

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Justice Mark Weinberg (Judge of the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Victoria and Inns of Court Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in London in 2016-17) discusses difficulties with the length and complexity of jury directions experienced in a number of common law countries in recent years. His paper looks in particular at the situation in Australia where, in some respects, jury directions had become a major problem for the criminal justice system and considers the wider application of the Australian solutions to lawyers in England and Wales.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Justice Mark Weinberg (Judge of the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Victoria and Inns of Court Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in London in 2016-17) discusses difficulties with the length and complexity of jury directions experienced in a number of common law countries in recent years. His paper looks in particular at the situation in Australia where, in some respects, jury directions had become a major problem for the criminal justice system and considers the wider application of the Australian solutions to lawyers in England and Wales.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Justice Mark Weinberg (Judge of the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Victoria and Inns of Court Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in London in 2016-17) discusses difficulties with the length and complexity of jury directions experienced in a number of common law countries in recent years. His paper looks in particular at the situation in Australia where, in some respects, jury directions had become a major problem for the criminal justice system and considers the wider application of the Australian solutions to lawyers in England and Wales.

Key concepts: Jury, Appeal, Law, Supreme court, Economic Justice, Political science, Hung jury, High Court

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Jury direction – an antipodean experiment — Research Paper | ScholarLens