2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Affects of racialization

Tamar Blickstein

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

Racialization is a phenomenon deeply embedded in affective logics, practices, and histories, and is a paradigmatically affective process in its own right. Yet affect studies as a subfield has not made “race” a central focus of scrutiny. This chapter proposes “affects of racialization” as a useful conceptual frame for analyzing racialization’s affective dimensions through the perspectives of history, theory, and environment. I first historicize affects of racialization as a tool of colonial domination, and critically consider the ways affect theories themselves have historically been vectors of racialized biopolitics. I then delineate the theoretical contours of the concept by drawing on Fanon’s foundational affect theory, and argue for treating racialization as a paradigmatic affective phenomenon. Finally, I draw on ethnographic case studies of environmental racism in the Americas, showing how affects of racialization reinforce environmental modes of dispossession today, but also, how they are overturned through decolonial acts of refusal.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Racialization is a phenomenon deeply embedded in affective logics, practices, and histories, and is a paradigmatically affective process in its own right. Yet affect studies as a subfield has not made “race” a central focus of scrutiny. This chapter proposes “affects of racialization” as a useful conceptual frame for analyzing racialization’s affective dimensions through the perspectives of history, theory, and environment. I first historicize affects of racialization as a tool of colonial domination, and critically consider the ways affect theories themselves have historically been vectors of racialized biopolitics. I then delineate the theoretical contours of the concept by drawing on Fanon’s foundational affect theory, and argue for treating racialization as a paradigmatic affective phenomenon. Finally, I draw on ethnographic case studies of environmental racism in the Americas, showing how affects of racialization reinforce environmental modes of dispossession today, but also, how they are overturned through decolonial acts of refusal.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Racialization is a phenomenon deeply embedded in affective logics, practices, and histories, and is a paradigmatically affective process in its own right. Yet affect studies as a subfield has not made “race” a central focus of scrutiny. This chapter proposes “affects of racialization” as a useful conceptual frame for analyzing racialization’s affective dimensions through the perspectives of history, theory, and environment. I first historicize affects of racialization as a tool of colonial domination, and critically consider the ways affect theories themselves have historically been vectors of racialized biopolitics. I then delineate the theoretical contours of the concept by drawing on Fanon’s foundational affect theory, and argue for treating racialization as a paradigmatic affective phenomenon. Finally, I draw on ethnographic case studies of environmental racism in the Americas, showing how affects of racialization reinforce environmental modes of dispossession today, but also, how they are overturned through decolonial acts of refusal.

Key concepts: Racialization, Sociology, History, Gender studies, Race (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Affects of racialization — Research Paper | ScholarLens