2019British Journal of PsychotherapyRequires access

The Harmful Effects of Psychotherapy: When the Therapeutic Alliance Fails

Jean Knox

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

A good therapeutic alliance has been found to be the best predictor of outcome in psychotherapy, but psychotherapists also need to develop an understanding of the mechanisms by which that alliance is created and the factors that may damage that alliance and contribute to harmful effects of psychotherapy. I explore these factors in three contexts: the nature of the therapy itself, the characteristics of the therapist, and the dynamics of the patient–therapist relationship. I discuss the research that suggests that potentially harmful processes can be avoided by a dynamic‐agentive systems model, which views psychotherapy as a conversation, in which turn‐taking, rupture and repair, and perspective‐taking are the intersubjective tools that help to build the therapeutic alliance and that can be the focus for further study into the mechanisms by which psychotherapy is helpful or harmful. The neuroscience research that supports this model is summarized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A good therapeutic alliance has been found to be the best predictor of outcome in psychotherapy, but psychotherapists also need to develop an understanding of the mechanisms by which that alliance is created and the factors that may damage that alliance and contribute to harmful effects of psychotherapy. I explore these factors in three contexts: the nature of the therapy itself, the characteristics of the therapist, and the dynamics of the patient–therapist relationship. I discuss the research that suggests that potentially harmful processes can be avoided by a dynamic‐agentive systems model, which views psychotherapy as a conversation, in which turn‐taking, rupture and repair, and perspective‐taking are the intersubjective tools that help to build the therapeutic alliance and that can be the focus for further study into the mechanisms by which psychotherapy is helpful or harmful. The neuroscience research that supports this model is summarized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A good therapeutic alliance has been found to be the best predictor of outcome in psychotherapy, but psychotherapists also need to develop an understanding of the mechanisms by which that alliance is created and the factors that may damage that alliance and contribute to harmful effects of psychotherapy. I explore these factors in three contexts: the nature of the therapy itself, the characteristics of the therapist, and the dynamics of the patient–therapist relationship. I discuss the research that suggests that potentially harmful processes can be avoided by a dynamic‐agentive systems model, which views psychotherapy as a conversation, in which turn‐taking, rupture and repair, and perspective‐taking are the intersubjective tools that help to build the therapeutic alliance and that can be the focus for further study into the mechanisms by which psychotherapy is helpful or harmful. The neuroscience research that supports this model is summarized.

Key concepts: Alliance, Psychotherapist, Psychology, Conversation, Perspective (graphical), Outcome (game theory), Mathematical economics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Harmful Effects of Psychotherapy: When the Therapeutic Alliance Fails — Research Paper | ScholarLens