2020Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Open access

Vacuum fluctuation, microcyclic universes, and the cosmological constant problem

Qingdi Wang, W. G. Unruh

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

We point out that the standard formulation of the cosmological constant problem itself is problematic since it is trying to apply the very large scale homogeneous cosmological model to very small (Planck) scale phenomenon. At small scales, both the spacetime and the vacuum stress energy are highly inhomogeneous and wildly fluctuating. This is a version of Wheeler's ``spacetime foam.'' We show that this ``foamy'' structure would produce a large positive contribution to the average macroscopic spatial curvature of the Universe. In order to cancel this contribution to match the observation, the usually defined effective cosmological constant ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{eff}}={\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}+8\ensuremath{\pi}G⟨\ensuremath{\rho}⟩$ has to take a large negative value. The spacetime dynamics sourced by this large negative ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ would be similar to the cyclic model of the universe in the sense that at small scales every point in space is a ``microcyclic universe'' which is following an eternal series of oscillations between expansions and contractions. Moreover, if the bare cosmological constant ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}$ is dominant, the size of each ``microuniverse'' would increase a tiny bit at a slowly accelerating rate during each microcycle of the oscillation due to the weak parametric resonance effect produced by the fluctuations of the quantum vacuum stress energy tensor. In this way, the large cosmological constant generated at small scales is hidden at observable scale and no fine-tuning of ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}$ to the accuracy of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}122}$ is needed. This at least resolves the old cosmological constant problem and suggests that it is the quantum vacuum fluctuations serve as the dark energy which is accelerating the expansion of our Universe.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We point out that the standard formulation of the cosmological constant problem itself is problematic since it is trying to apply the very large scale homogeneous cosmological model to very small (Planck) scale phenomenon. At small scales, both the spacetime and the vacuum stress energy are highly inhomogeneous and wildly fluctuating. This is a version of Wheeler's ``spacetime foam.'' We show that this ``foamy'' structure would produce a large positive contribution to the average macroscopic spatial curvature of the Universe. In order to cancel this contribution to match the observation, the usually defined effective cosmological constant ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{eff}}={\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}+8\ensuremath{\pi}G⟨\ensuremath{\rho}⟩$ has to take a large negative value. The spacetime dynamics sourced by this large negative ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ would be similar to the cyclic model of the universe in the sense that at small scales every point in space is a ``microcyclic universe'' which is following an eternal series of oscillations between expansions and contractions. Moreover, if the bare cosmological constant ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}$ is dominant, the size of each ``microuniverse'' would increase a tiny bit at a slowly accelerating rate during each microcycle of the oscillation due to the weak parametric resonance effect produced by the fluctuations of the quantum vacuum stress energy tensor. In this way, the large cosmological constant generated at small scales is hidden at observable scale and no fine-tuning of ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}$ to the accuracy of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}122}$ is needed. This at least resolves the old cosmological constant problem and suggests that it is the quantum vacuum fluctuations serve as the dark energy which is accelerating the expansion of our Universe.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We point out that the standard formulation of the cosmological constant problem itself is problematic since it is trying to apply the very large scale homogeneous cosmological model to very small (Planck) scale phenomenon. At small scales, both the spacetime and the vacuum stress energy are highly inhomogeneous and wildly fluctuating. This is a version of Wheeler's ``spacetime foam.'' We show that this ``foamy'' structure would produce a large positive contribution to the average macroscopic spatial curvature of the Universe. In order to cancel this contribution to match the observation, the usually defined effective cosmological constant ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{eff}}={\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}+8\ensuremath{\pi}G⟨\ensuremath{\rho}⟩$ has to take a large negative value. The spacetime dynamics sourced by this large negative ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ would be similar to the cyclic model of the universe in the sense that at small scales every point in space is a ``microcyclic universe'' which is following an eternal series of oscillations between expansions and contractions. Moreover, if the bare cosmological constant ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}$ is dominant, the size of each ``microuniverse'' would increase a tiny bit at a slowly accelerating rate during each microcycle of the oscillation due to the weak parametric resonance effect produced by the fluctuations of the quantum vacuum stress energy tensor. In this way, the large cosmological constant generated at small scales is hidden at observable scale and no fine-tuning of ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{B}$ to the accuracy of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}122}$ is needed. This at least resolves the old cosmological constant problem and suggests that it is the quantum vacuum fluctuations serve as the dark energy which is accelerating the expansion of our Universe.

Key concepts: Physics, Cosmological constant, Vacuum energy, Universe, Metric expansion of space, Spacetime, De Sitter universe, Lambda

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vacuum fluctuation, microcyclic universes, and the cosmological constant problem — Research Paper | ScholarLens