2019•Advanced Materials InterfacesRequires access

A Simple Model for Binding and Rupture of Bacterial Cells on Nanopillar Surfaces

Gregory Shaun Watson, David W. Green, Jolanta Anna Watson, Zupeng Zhou, Xin Li, Gary S.P. Cheung, Marty Gellender

Open publisher page 66 citations

Abstract

Abstract Surfaces based on both chemical and physical mechanisms of attack may yield the next generation of bactericidal and antibacterial surfaces. A simple model is presented based on surface energies explaining the physical action of attack on bacteria (deformation/rupture) by nanopillar surfaces. The analysis is subject to three important constraints which impact on the optimal nanopillar radius, spacing, and length: 1) Nanopillar radius >> the Minimum nanopillar radius which allows for cell wall conformation (so that the surface energy releases when the outer cell layer binds to the nanopillar > work required to bend the layer around the nanopillar). 2) The inter‐nanopillar spacing must be << the size of the bacterial cell (so that the cell becomes bound to several nanopillars). 3) The length of the nanopillars must be greater than the distance that the bacteria cell wall would be pulled along the nanopillar shaft.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Surfaces based on both chemical and physical mechanisms of attack may yield the next generation of bactericidal and antibacterial surfaces. A simple model is presented based on surface energies explaining the physical action of attack on bacteria (deformation/rupture) by nanopillar surfaces. The analysis is subject to three important constraints which impact on the optimal nanopillar radius, spacing, and length: 1) Nanopillar radius >> the Minimum nanopillar radius which allows for cell wall conformation (so that the surface energy releases when the outer cell layer binds to the nanopillar > work required to bend the layer around the nanopillar). 2) The inter‐nanopillar spacing must be << the size of the bacterial cell (so that the cell becomes bound to several nanopillars). 3) The length of the nanopillars must be greater than the distance that the bacteria cell wall would be pulled along the nanopillar shaft.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Surfaces based on both chemical and physical mechanisms of attack may yield the next generation of bactericidal and antibacterial surfaces. A simple model is presented based on surface energies explaining the physical action of attack on bacteria (deformation/rupture) by nanopillar surfaces. The analysis is subject to three important constraints which impact on the optimal nanopillar radius, spacing, and length: 1) Nanopillar radius >> the Minimum nanopillar radius which allows for cell wall conformation (so that the surface energy releases when the outer cell layer binds to the nanopillar > work required to bend the layer around the nanopillar). 2) The inter‐nanopillar spacing must be << the size of the bacterial cell (so that the cell becomes bound to several nanopillars). 3) The length of the nanopillars must be greater than the distance that the bacteria cell wall would be pulled along the nanopillar shaft.

Key concepts: Nanopillar, RADIUS, Materials science, Nanotechnology, Nanostructure, Computer science, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Simple Model for Binding and Rupture of Bacterial Cells on Nanopillar Surfaces — Research Paper | ScholarLens