2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Harmonization and mutual recognition: What are the effects on trade?

Nadia Rocha, Roberta Piermartini, Gianluca Orefice

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This paper analyses the effect of harmonization and mutual recognition of standards on trade flows. Although harmonization and mutual recognition are commonly believed to reduce trade costs towards freer trade, their impact on trade is more complex, and little is known about their actual effects. In order to assess which approach has the greatest impact on trade, this paper looks at the evidence stemming from regional trade agreements. Not all regional trade agreements cover TBT area and among those that do, some favour harmonization, others favour mutual recognition. Using a gravity model, we estimate the effects on trade of harmonization and mutual recognition on the patterns of trade. Results show that standards harmonization and mutual recognition enhance trade. Moreover, mutual recognition has a higher positive effect on trade than harmonization, and this is due to mutual recognition of conformity assessment. These results are robust to endogeneity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper analyses the effect of harmonization and mutual recognition of standards on trade flows. Although harmonization and mutual recognition are commonly believed to reduce trade costs towards freer trade, their impact on trade is more complex, and little is known about their actual effects. In order to assess which approach has the greatest impact on trade, this paper looks at the evidence stemming from regional trade agreements. Not all regional trade agreements cover TBT area and among those that do, some favour harmonization, others favour mutual recognition. Using a gravity model, we estimate the effects on trade of harmonization and mutual recognition on the patterns of trade. Results show that standards harmonization and mutual recognition enhance trade. Moreover, mutual recognition has a higher positive effect on trade than harmonization, and this is due to mutual recognition of conformity assessment. These results are robust to endogeneity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper analyses the effect of harmonization and mutual recognition of standards on trade flows. Although harmonization and mutual recognition are commonly believed to reduce trade costs towards freer trade, their impact on trade is more complex, and little is known about their actual effects. In order to assess which approach has the greatest impact on trade, this paper looks at the evidence stemming from regional trade agreements. Not all regional trade agreements cover TBT area and among those that do, some favour harmonization, others favour mutual recognition. Using a gravity model, we estimate the effects on trade of harmonization and mutual recognition on the patterns of trade. Results show that standards harmonization and mutual recognition enhance trade. Moreover, mutual recognition has a higher positive effect on trade than harmonization, and this is due to mutual recognition of conformity assessment. These results are robust to endogeneity.

Key concepts: Harmonization, Mutual recognition, International economics, International trade, Trade barrier, Conformity assessment, Endogeneity, Bilateral trade

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Harmonization and mutual recognition: What are the effects on trade? — Research Paper | ScholarLens