Perbandingan Akurasi Euclidean Distance, Minkowski Distance, dan Manhattan Distance pada Algoritma K-Means Clustering berbasis Chi-Square
M. Nishom
Abstract
Open-access reader
M. Nishom
Abstract
Open-access reader
In data mining, there are several algorithms that are often used in grouping data, including K-Means. However, this method still has several disadvantages, including the problem of the level of accuracy of the methods used to measure the similarities between the objects being compared. To overcome this problem, in this study a comparison was made between three methods (euclidean distance, manhattan distance, and minkowski distance) to determine the status of disparity in Teacher's needs in Tegal City. The results showed that of the three methods compared had a good level of accuracy, which is 84.47% (for euclidean distance), 83.85% (for manhattan distance), and 83.85% (for minkowski distance). In addition, this study also informs that there are still 6 (six) schools with conditions that are very poorly available for teachers (in the category of HIGH disparity labels) and need to get more attention, which is SMP Atmaja Wacana, SMKN 3 Tegal, SMAS Muhammadiyah, SMAS Pancasakti Tegal, SMKS Muhammadiyah 1 Kota Tegal, and SMP IC Bias Assalam.
OpenAlex reports 112 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In data mining, there are several algorithms that are often used in grouping data, including K-Means. However, this method still has several disadvantages, including the problem of the level of accuracy of the methods used to measure the similarities between the objects being compared. To overcome this problem, in this study a comparison was made between three methods (euclidean distance, manhattan distance, and minkowski distance) to determine the status of disparity in Teacher's needs in Tegal City. The results showed that of the three methods compared had a good level of accuracy, which is 84.47% (for euclidean distance), 83.85% (for manhattan distance), and 83.85% (for minkowski distance). In addition, this study also informs that there are still 6 (six) schools with conditions that are very poorly available for teachers (in the category of HIGH disparity labels) and need to get more attention, which is SMP Atmaja Wacana, SMKN 3 Tegal, SMAS Muhammadiyah, SMAS Pancasakti Tegal, SMKS Muhammadiyah 1 Kota Tegal, and SMP IC Bias Assalam.
Key concepts: Minkowski distance, Euclidean distance, Minkowski space, Cluster analysis, Distance measurement, Measure (data warehouse), Euclidean geometry, Computer science