2019•The Journal of RheumatologyOpen access

The Role of Ultrasound in Psoriatic Arthritis — Do We Need a Score?

Maria Antonietta D’Agostino, Laura C. Coates

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Enthesitis is one of the hallmarks of the spondyloarthritis (SpA) group, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA)1,2. Enthesitis is usually defined as inflammation at the site of attachment of a tendon, ligament, and capsule onto bone, which can cause significant pain and disability for patients2. In recent years, the interest in this domain of disease has grown with increasing evidence of its prevalence and potential importance in the pathogenesis of the disease3. One of the limitations in understanding the exact role of enthesitis in these diseases has been the difficulty in assessing this feature3,4. Usually enthesitis is evaluated by clinical assessment, which measured the pain provoked by physical examination of entheseal sites. However, tenderness at the entheseal site does not always denote inflammation, and its absence does not rule out enthesitis. The introduction of new drugs and the wider use of imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (US) in clinical and research practice, highlight the pivotal role of enthesitis for the diagnosis and management of both SpA (axial and peripheral) and PsA. Nevertheless, it has frequently been shown that clinical assessment of pain at tendon insertions does not always correlate with imaging assessment of inflammation5,6,7,8. The clinical examination of enthesitis may also identify pain from tendinosis, from nearby joint synovitis, or from other pain mechanisms without any true involvement of the adjacent enthesis. In addition, it has been reported that a significant proportion of patients with PsA, and indeed patients with psoriasis, have subclinical enthesitis with inflammation seen on imaging, without tenderness at the insertion9. US has been proven to be a valuable tool to assess entheseal involvement across the SpA spectrum, including PsA7,8,9 … Address correspondence to L.C. Coates, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK. E-mail: laura.coates{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Enthesitis is one of the hallmarks of the spondyloarthritis (SpA) group, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA)1,2. Enthesitis is usually defined as inflammation at the site of attachment of a tendon, ligament, and capsule onto bone, which can cause significant pain and disability for patients2. In recent years, the interest in this domain of disease has grown with increasing evidence of its prevalence and potential importance in the pathogenesis of the disease3. One of the limitations in understanding the exact role of enthesitis in these diseases has been the difficulty in assessing this feature3,4. Usually enthesitis is evaluated by clinical assessment, which measured the pain provoked by physical examination of entheseal sites. However, tenderness at the entheseal site does not always denote inflammation, and its absence does not rule out enthesitis. The introduction of new drugs and the wider use of imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (US) in clinical and research practice, highlight the pivotal role of enthesitis for the diagnosis and management of both SpA (axial and peripheral) and PsA. Nevertheless, it has frequently been shown that clinical assessment of pain at tendon insertions does not always correlate with imaging assessment of inflammation5,6,7,8. The clinical examination of enthesitis may also identify pain from tendinosis, from nearby joint synovitis, or from other pain mechanisms without any true involvement of the adjacent enthesis. In addition, it has been reported that a significant proportion of patients with PsA, and indeed patients with psoriasis, have subclinical enthesitis with inflammation seen on imaging, without tenderness at the insertion9. US has been proven to be a valuable tool to assess entheseal involvement across the SpA spectrum, including PsA7,8,9 … Address correspondence to L.C. Coates, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK. E-mail: laura.coates{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Enthesitis is one of the hallmarks of the spondyloarthritis (SpA) group, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA)1,2. Enthesitis is usually defined as inflammation at the site of attachment of a tendon, ligament, and capsule onto bone, which can cause significant pain and disability for patients2. In recent years, the interest in this domain of disease has grown with increasing evidence of its prevalence and potential importance in the pathogenesis of the disease3. One of the limitations in understanding the exact role of enthesitis in these diseases has been the difficulty in assessing this feature3,4. Usually enthesitis is evaluated by clinical assessment, which measured the pain provoked by physical examination of entheseal sites. However, tenderness at the entheseal site does not always denote inflammation, and its absence does not rule out enthesitis. The introduction of new drugs and the wider use of imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (US) in clinical and research practice, highlight the pivotal role of enthesitis for the diagnosis and management of both SpA (axial and peripheral) and PsA. Nevertheless, it has frequently been shown that clinical assessment of pain at tendon insertions does not always correlate with imaging assessment of inflammation5,6,7,8. The clinical examination of enthesitis may also identify pain from tendinosis, from nearby joint synovitis, or from other pain mechanisms without any true involvement of the adjacent enthesis. In addition, it has been reported that a significant proportion of patients with PsA, and indeed patients with psoriasis, have subclinical enthesitis with inflammation seen on imaging, without tenderness at the insertion9. US has been proven to be a valuable tool to assess entheseal involvement across the SpA spectrum, including PsA7,8,9 … Address correspondence to L.C. Coates, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK. E-mail: laura.coates{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk.

Key concepts: Enthesitis, Medicine, Psoriatic arthritis, Enthesis, Spondyloarthropathy, Synovitis, Dactylitis, Tenosynovitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Role of Ultrasound in Psoriatic Arthritis — Do We Need a Score? — Research Paper | ScholarLens