Autogenous tooth roots for lateral extraction socket augmentation and staged implant placement. A prospective observational study
Frank Schwarz, Didem Sahin, Kathrin Becker, Robert Sader, Jürgen Becker
Abstract
Frank Schwarz, Didem Sahin, Kathrin Becker, Robert Sader, Jürgen Becker
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of using autogenous tooth roots (TR) for a lateral augmentation of deficient extraction sockets and two-stage implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients were recruited to perform a simultaneous, lateral augmentation of deficient (i.e., thickness of the buccal bone < 0.5 mm or buccal dehiscence-type defects) fresh extraction sockets using the respective non-retainable but non-infected teeth (n = 15). After 26 weeks of submerged healing, the primary endpoint was defined as the crestal ridge width (mm) (CW26) being sufficient to place an adequately dimensioned titanium implant at the respective sites. RESULTS: The surgical procedure could be accomplished in n = 14 patients. Soft tissue healing was uneventful in all patients. CW26 at visit 6 allowed for a successful implant placement in all patients (e.g., 14/14). Mean CW26 values amounted to 10.85 ± 2.71 mm (median: 8.5). The change (4.89 ± 2.29 mm) in CW compared to baseline was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The usage of TR may represent a feasible approach for lateral augmentation of deficient extraction sockets and two-stage implant placement.
OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of using autogenous tooth roots (TR) for a lateral augmentation of deficient extraction sockets and two-stage implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients were recruited to perform a simultaneous, lateral augmentation of deficient (i.e., thickness of the buccal bone < 0.5 mm or buccal dehiscence-type defects) fresh extraction sockets using the respective non-retainable but non-infected teeth (n = 15). After 26 weeks of submerged healing, the primary endpoint was defined as the crestal ridge width (mm) (CW26) being sufficient to place an adequately dimensioned titanium implant at the respective sites. RESULTS: The surgical procedure could be accomplished in n = 14 patients. Soft tissue healing was uneventful in all patients. CW26 at visit 6 allowed for a successful implant placement in all patients (e.g., 14/14). Mean CW26 values amounted to 10.85 ± 2.71 mm (median: 8.5). The change (4.89 ± 2.29 mm) in CW compared to baseline was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The usage of TR may represent a feasible approach for lateral augmentation of deficient extraction sockets and two-stage implant placement.
Key concepts: Dentistry, Medicine, Observational study, Implant, Orthodontics, Surgery, Pathology