2016Proceedings of DRSOpen access

Design Research in Interior Design Education: A Living Framework for Teaching the Undergraduate Capstone Studio in the 21st Century

Charles Boggs, Helena Moussatche, Catherine Pizzichemi, Meghan Woodcock

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper serves as a reflective discussion on the changing forces impacting the undergraduate interior design capstone studio. Reinforced by a successful Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA) visit during the fall of 2015, the program has identified a major shift in the process approach to better structure the potential development of design innovation: moving from a reactive mode based on industry expectations and standard systematic research methods towards using a living research and design framework refined throughout the design process as observations and findings evolve. The CIDA accreditation review offered 'evidence' of the results of this shift. By reviewing the process of teaching the capstone over the last 7 years, this paper provides a platform to ground the current state of the pedagogical framework employed from its early stages to its current form.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper serves as a reflective discussion on the changing forces impacting the undergraduate interior design capstone studio. Reinforced by a successful Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA) visit during the fall of 2015, the program has identified a major shift in the process approach to better structure the potential development of design innovation: moving from a reactive mode based on industry expectations and standard systematic research methods towards using a living research and design framework refined throughout the design process as observations and findings evolve. The CIDA accreditation review offered 'evidence' of the results of this shift. By reviewing the process of teaching the capstone over the last 7 years, this paper provides a platform to ground the current state of the pedagogical framework employed from its early stages to its current form.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper serves as a reflective discussion on the changing forces impacting the undergraduate interior design capstone studio. Reinforced by a successful Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA) visit during the fall of 2015, the program has identified a major shift in the process approach to better structure the potential development of design innovation: moving from a reactive mode based on industry expectations and standard systematic research methods towards using a living research and design framework refined throughout the design process as observations and findings evolve. The CIDA accreditation review offered 'evidence' of the results of this shift. By reviewing the process of teaching the capstone over the last 7 years, this paper provides a platform to ground the current state of the pedagogical framework employed from its early stages to its current form.

Key concepts: Capstone, Accreditation, Studio, Process (computing), Design studio, Engineering management, Interior design, Engineering ethics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Design Research in Interior Design Education: A Living Framework for Teaching the Undergraduate Capstone Studio in the 21st Century — Research Paper | ScholarLens