2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

English Language Arts Case Study

Sarah M. Bonner, Peggy P. Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this case study of a fifth-grade, high-achieving, high-needs ELA classroom, the authors present a complete cycle of instruction and assessment with samples of student work, teacher feedback, and a peek into decision-making and inferences teachers can base on assessment information. Mrs. L wants to target her students’ reading comprehension and analysis. She identifies the relevant standards, defines SLOs and objectives for student self-monitoring and self-reflection, and implements a pre-assessment to examine students’ awareness of reading strategies. She presents students with strategies for doing character analysis with a text, asks them to try the strategies, and holds reading conferences with individual students to check their progress. Three student samples are presented at various levels of proficiency. Mrs. L embeds frequent assessment in her instructional routines, asks students to reflect on their own work, and gives “glows” and “grows” as feedback. After students are given a culminating assessment to check their ability to use textual evidence support of claims, Mrs. L communicates the results to students and their parents. At various checkpoints, the authors suggest ways Mrs. L’s assessment activities align with their four-stage CA:SRL framework.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this case study of a fifth-grade, high-achieving, high-needs ELA classroom, the authors present a complete cycle of instruction and assessment with samples of student work, teacher feedback, and a peek into decision-making and inferences teachers can base on assessment information. Mrs. L wants to target her students’ reading comprehension and analysis. She identifies the relevant standards, defines SLOs and objectives for student self-monitoring and self-reflection, and implements a pre-assessment to examine students’ awareness of reading strategies. She presents students with strategies for doing character analysis with a text, asks them to try the strategies, and holds reading conferences with individual students to check their progress. Three student samples are presented at various levels of proficiency. Mrs. L embeds frequent assessment in her instructional routines, asks students to reflect on their own work, and gives “glows” and “grows” as feedback. After students are given a culminating assessment to check their ability to use textual evidence support of claims, Mrs. L communicates the results to students and their parents. At various checkpoints, the authors suggest ways Mrs. L’s assessment activities align with their four-stage CA:SRL framework.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this case study of a fifth-grade, high-achieving, high-needs ELA classroom, the authors present a complete cycle of instruction and assessment with samples of student work, teacher feedback, and a peek into decision-making and inferences teachers can base on assessment information. Mrs. L wants to target her students’ reading comprehension and analysis. She identifies the relevant standards, defines SLOs and objectives for student self-monitoring and self-reflection, and implements a pre-assessment to examine students’ awareness of reading strategies. She presents students with strategies for doing character analysis with a text, asks them to try the strategies, and holds reading conferences with individual students to check their progress. Three student samples are presented at various levels of proficiency. Mrs. L embeds frequent assessment in her instructional routines, asks students to reflect on their own work, and gives “glows” and “grows” as feedback. After students are given a culminating assessment to check their ability to use textual evidence support of claims, Mrs. L communicates the results to students and their parents. At various checkpoints, the authors suggest ways Mrs. L’s assessment activities align with their four-stage CA:SRL framework.

Key concepts: The arts, Linguistics, English language, Computer science, Art, Visual arts, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
English Language Arts Case Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens