English Language Arts Case Study
Sarah M. Bonner, Peggy P. Chen
Abstract
Sarah M. Bonner, Peggy P. Chen
Abstract
In this case study of a fifth-grade, high-achieving, high-needs ELA classroom, the authors present a complete cycle of instruction and assessment with samples of student work, teacher feedback, and a peek into decision-making and inferences teachers can base on assessment information. Mrs. L wants to target her students’ reading comprehension and analysis. She identifies the relevant standards, defines SLOs and objectives for student self-monitoring and self-reflection, and implements a pre-assessment to examine students’ awareness of reading strategies. She presents students with strategies for doing character analysis with a text, asks them to try the strategies, and holds reading conferences with individual students to check their progress. Three student samples are presented at various levels of proficiency. Mrs. L embeds frequent assessment in her instructional routines, asks students to reflect on their own work, and gives “glows” and “grows” as feedback. After students are given a culminating assessment to check their ability to use textual evidence support of claims, Mrs. L communicates the results to students and their parents. At various checkpoints, the authors suggest ways Mrs. L’s assessment activities align with their four-stage CA:SRL framework.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this case study of a fifth-grade, high-achieving, high-needs ELA classroom, the authors present a complete cycle of instruction and assessment with samples of student work, teacher feedback, and a peek into decision-making and inferences teachers can base on assessment information. Mrs. L wants to target her students’ reading comprehension and analysis. She identifies the relevant standards, defines SLOs and objectives for student self-monitoring and self-reflection, and implements a pre-assessment to examine students’ awareness of reading strategies. She presents students with strategies for doing character analysis with a text, asks them to try the strategies, and holds reading conferences with individual students to check their progress. Three student samples are presented at various levels of proficiency. Mrs. L embeds frequent assessment in her instructional routines, asks students to reflect on their own work, and gives “glows” and “grows” as feedback. After students are given a culminating assessment to check their ability to use textual evidence support of claims, Mrs. L communicates the results to students and their parents. At various checkpoints, the authors suggest ways Mrs. L’s assessment activities align with their four-stage CA:SRL framework.
Key concepts: The arts, Linguistics, English language, Computer science, Art, Visual arts, Philosophy