2018•eYLS (Yale Law School)Requires access

A Blueprint for a New American Trade Policy

Timothy L. Meyer, Ganesh Sitaraman

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we offer ten recommendations on how to reform American trade policy. These reforms respond to three fundamental challenges: (1) our trade bureaucracy is poorly designed to craft and execute a trade policy that pursues multiple important ends, including economic and national security; (2) the domestic process through which the United States makes trade agreements provides preferential access to certain interest groups (capital and corporations) but not others; and (3) U.S. trade policy has failed to grapple with the distributional consequences of trade liberalization. The first set of reforms addresses the domestic trade policymaking process. These include restructuring the Department of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative (USTR), and other agencies into a new Department of Economic Growth and Security; increasing transparency and participation in the trade policymaking process; conducting geographic impact assessments; and reforming the President’s powers to initiate trade wars. The second set of reforms seeks to rebalance international trade regimes by both conditioning U.S. trade on addressing tax havens and reforming the investor-state dispute system. The final set of recommendations addresses the domestic distributional consequences of trade head on, and include expanding enforcement of labor and environmental issues, enabling domestic economic development projects particularly for areas adversely-impacted by trade liberalization, and taxing the winners of trade.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, we offer ten recommendations on how to reform American trade policy. These reforms respond to three fundamental challenges: (1) our trade bureaucracy is poorly designed to craft and execute a trade policy that pursues multiple important ends, including economic and national security; (2) the domestic process through which the United States makes trade agreements provides preferential access to certain interest groups (capital and corporations) but not others; and (3) U.S. trade policy has failed to grapple with the distributional consequences of trade liberalization. The first set of reforms addresses the domestic trade policymaking process. These include restructuring the Department of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative (USTR), and other agencies into a new Department of Economic Growth and Security; increasing transparency and participation in the trade policymaking process; conducting geographic impact assessments; and reforming the President’s powers to initiate trade wars. The second set of reforms seeks to rebalance international trade regimes by both conditioning U.S. trade on addressing tax havens and reforming the investor-state dispute system. The final set of recommendations addresses the domestic distributional consequences of trade head on, and include expanding enforcement of labor and environmental issues, enabling domestic economic development projects particularly for areas adversely-impacted by trade liberalization, and taxing the winners of trade.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, we offer ten recommendations on how to reform American trade policy. These reforms respond to three fundamental challenges: (1) our trade bureaucracy is poorly designed to craft and execute a trade policy that pursues multiple important ends, including economic and national security; (2) the domestic process through which the United States makes trade agreements provides preferential access to certain interest groups (capital and corporations) but not others; and (3) U.S. trade policy has failed to grapple with the distributional consequences of trade liberalization. The first set of reforms addresses the domestic trade policymaking process. These include restructuring the Department of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative (USTR), and other agencies into a new Department of Economic Growth and Security; increasing transparency and participation in the trade policymaking process; conducting geographic impact assessments; and reforming the President’s powers to initiate trade wars. The second set of reforms seeks to rebalance international trade regimes by both conditioning U.S. trade on addressing tax havens and reforming the investor-state dispute system. The final set of recommendations addresses the domestic distributional consequences of trade head on, and include expanding enforcement of labor and environmental issues, enabling domestic economic development projects particularly for areas adversely-impacted by trade liberalization, and taxing the winners of trade.

Key concepts: Blueprint, Business, International trade, Computer science, Economics, Political science, Engineering, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Blueprint for a New American Trade Policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens