Trade Policy, Factor Markets and Social Structures in Africa
Leena Kerkelä, Janne Niemi
Abstract
Open-access reader
Leena Kerkelä, Janne Niemi
Abstract
Open-access reader
Different reciprocal and non-reciprocal trade arrangements are under evaluation for African countries, including regional trade arrangements (SADC) and EU’s initiatives ("Everything but Arms", Cotonou agreement). In this paper we present simulations with GTAP5 database of these interacting trade policy shocks for SADC countries. A detailed regional disaggregation makes it possible to formulate case studies for a range of countries when adverse impacts are an outcome of symmetric shocks or asymmetric shocks produce different impacts for different countries. As an asymmetric shock we formulate the EBA initiative, which treats LDC countries more favorably compared to the GSP treatment. In this paper the main results are presented and the basis for deeper analysis on the transmission of trade policy to the capacity building level are laid out. In the ex-post analysis we assume that the description of economies in GTAP 5 database and model are a starting point for the analysis when country specific observations on imperfections in the market are necessary to get a picture of how the social structures are conditioned the outcome and how they are affected by the structural changes due to the trade policy reforms. Additionally, the GTAP database has been improved regarding preferential treatment imposed by e.g. GSP system and, for countries included in Lomé Convention, by European Union. For this purpose, we use tariff data obtained from the TRAINS database. The economy wide effects seem to be negative for many African economies in scenarios representing free trade area between EU and SADC and different changes in EU's protection policy. The pure free trade area between SADC countries turns out to generate negative welfare effects for some of the participating countries. Effects are mainly due to strong model specific terms of trade effects but resource allocation varies also between countries.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Different reciprocal and non-reciprocal trade arrangements are under evaluation for African countries, including regional trade arrangements (SADC) and EU’s initiatives ("Everything but Arms", Cotonou agreement). In this paper we present simulations with GTAP5 database of these interacting trade policy shocks for SADC countries. A detailed regional disaggregation makes it possible to formulate case studies for a range of countries when adverse impacts are an outcome of symmetric shocks or asymmetric shocks produce different impacts for different countries. As an asymmetric shock we formulate the EBA initiative, which treats LDC countries more favorably compared to the GSP treatment. In this paper the main results are presented and the basis for deeper analysis on the transmission of trade policy to the capacity building level are laid out. In the ex-post analysis we assume that the description of economies in GTAP 5 database and model are a starting point for the analysis when country specific observations on imperfections in the market are necessary to get a picture of how the social structures are conditioned the outcome and how they are affected by the structural changes due to the trade policy reforms. Additionally, the GTAP database has been improved regarding preferential treatment imposed by e.g. GSP system and, for countries included in Lomé Convention, by European Union. For this purpose, we use tariff data obtained from the TRAINS database. The economy wide effects seem to be negative for many African economies in scenarios representing free trade area between EU and SADC and different changes in EU's protection policy. The pure free trade area between SADC countries turns out to generate negative welfare effects for some of the participating countries. Effects are mainly due to strong model specific terms of trade effects but resource allocation varies also between countries.
Key concepts: Economics, Business, Development economics, International trade, Political science