2019Sakarya Medical JournalOpen access

Autotransplantation of Cryopreserved/Thawed Ovarian Tissue: Overview of Methods and Challenges

Hülya Ayık Aydın, Azize Yasemin Göksu Erol, Armagan Aydın

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In recent years, an increasing number of women diagnosed with malignant or non-malignant diseases have been subjected to cytotoxic chemoradiotherapy. Women who face the possibility of premature or imminent ovarian failure caused by cytotoxic therapy may retain their fertility potential via ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Despite its advantages, this fertility preservation method for women at risk of losing reproductive function is considered experimental due to 1) a possible decrease in the ovarian follicular pool as a result of cryopreservation and thawing procedures (although this has been minimised by improved methods), or by ischemic damage occurring during ovarian transplantation; and 2) the risk of minimal residual disease (which is the most important factor). Although the indications for ovarian cryopreservation now extend beyond cancer, cancer survivors remain as the patient population who most commonly need this procedure. For these patients, the risk of minimal residual disease, which can be defined as reintroducing pre-existing cancer cells, is an important challenge for the application of this method. Even though the risk of reimplanting pre-existing cancer cells through ovarian transplantation is minimal or non-existent for most types of cancer, this risk must be ascertained according to cancer type and disease stage.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent years, an increasing number of women diagnosed with malignant or non-malignant diseases have been subjected to cytotoxic chemoradiotherapy. Women who face the possibility of premature or imminent ovarian failure caused by cytotoxic therapy may retain their fertility potential via ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Despite its advantages, this fertility preservation method for women at risk of losing reproductive function is considered experimental due to 1) a possible decrease in the ovarian follicular pool as a result of cryopreservation and thawing procedures (although this has been minimised by improved methods), or by ischemic damage occurring during ovarian transplantation; and 2) the risk of minimal residual disease (which is the most important factor). Although the indications for ovarian cryopreservation now extend beyond cancer, cancer survivors remain as the patient population who most commonly need this procedure. For these patients, the risk of minimal residual disease, which can be defined as reintroducing pre-existing cancer cells, is an important challenge for the application of this method. Even though the risk of reimplanting pre-existing cancer cells through ovarian transplantation is minimal or non-existent for most types of cancer, this risk must be ascertained according to cancer type and disease stage.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent years, an increasing number of women diagnosed with malignant or non-malignant diseases have been subjected to cytotoxic chemoradiotherapy. Women who face the possibility of premature or imminent ovarian failure caused by cytotoxic therapy may retain their fertility potential via ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Despite its advantages, this fertility preservation method for women at risk of losing reproductive function is considered experimental due to 1) a possible decrease in the ovarian follicular pool as a result of cryopreservation and thawing procedures (although this has been minimised by improved methods), or by ischemic damage occurring during ovarian transplantation; and 2) the risk of minimal residual disease (which is the most important factor). Although the indications for ovarian cryopreservation now extend beyond cancer, cancer survivors remain as the patient population who most commonly need this procedure. For these patients, the risk of minimal residual disease, which can be defined as reintroducing pre-existing cancer cells, is an important challenge for the application of this method. Even though the risk of reimplanting pre-existing cancer cells through ovarian transplantation is minimal or non-existent for most types of cancer, this risk must be ascertained according to cancer type and disease stage.

Key concepts: Autotransplantation, Ovarian tissue cryopreservation, Ovarian cancer, Premature ovarian failure, Medicine, Cryopreservation, Fertility preservation, Disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Autotransplantation of Cryopreserved/Thawed Ovarian Tissue: Overview of Methods and Challenges — Research Paper | ScholarLens