2018Unpublished venueRequires access

We Need to Have a Second Conversation

Michelle Jackson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter argues that the need for two conversations about reducing poverty. Although it is important and valuable to continue on with our usual "poverty reform" conversation, there is also a need for a more assertive strategy. A precisely focused, science-based conversation that identifies social problems and offers specific, evidence-informed solutions. The chapter focuses on a single problem—the reduced educational investments of poor children—to illustrate how "Conversation One" works. In Conversation One, narrow solutions are proposed to overcome tightly defined problems, where the problem being solved may be but one manifestation of a much wider inequality. At worst, Conversation one may divert our attention from the root problem that the carefully delineated interventions are designed to address. Conversation Two insists that in addition to any discussion about expedient, small-scale interventions, we have a wider discussion about where poverty comes from and what types of larger-scale changes might be needed to eradicate it.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter argues that the need for two conversations about reducing poverty. Although it is important and valuable to continue on with our usual "poverty reform" conversation, there is also a need for a more assertive strategy. A precisely focused, science-based conversation that identifies social problems and offers specific, evidence-informed solutions. The chapter focuses on a single problem—the reduced educational investments of poor children—to illustrate how "Conversation One" works. In Conversation One, narrow solutions are proposed to overcome tightly defined problems, where the problem being solved may be but one manifestation of a much wider inequality. At worst, Conversation one may divert our attention from the root problem that the carefully delineated interventions are designed to address. Conversation Two insists that in addition to any discussion about expedient, small-scale interventions, we have a wider discussion about where poverty comes from and what types of larger-scale changes might be needed to eradicate it.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter argues that the need for two conversations about reducing poverty. Although it is important and valuable to continue on with our usual "poverty reform" conversation, there is also a need for a more assertive strategy. A precisely focused, science-based conversation that identifies social problems and offers specific, evidence-informed solutions. The chapter focuses on a single problem—the reduced educational investments of poor children—to illustrate how "Conversation One" works. In Conversation One, narrow solutions are proposed to overcome tightly defined problems, where the problem being solved may be but one manifestation of a much wider inequality. At worst, Conversation one may divert our attention from the root problem that the carefully delineated interventions are designed to address. Conversation Two insists that in addition to any discussion about expedient, small-scale interventions, we have a wider discussion about where poverty comes from and what types of larger-scale changes might be needed to eradicate it.

Key concepts: Conversation, Psychology, Sociology, Computer science, Communication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
We Need to Have a Second Conversation — Research Paper | ScholarLens