2019Journal of Management in EngineeringRequires access

Guidelines for Administrating and Drafting Nonpayment Owners' Obligation Provisions under Design-Build Contracts

Ibrahim S. Abotaleb, Islam H. El-adaway, Mohamed Ben Moussa

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

The obligations of the different contracting parties are set forth in most standard forms of contract. Despite that, research has shown that poor contract administration is one of the major causes of disputes in construction projects. The objective of this paper is to present contract administration guidelines for appropriate utilization and administration of the provisions related to owners' nonpayment obligations under design-build contracts. In doing so, the authors (1) analyze the provisions related to the owner's obligations under the most common national and international forms of design-build contract, (2) highlight the differences and commonalities among the analyzed contracts in a summarized form, and (3) present extensive guidelines in a checklist form to assess the parties' understanding of their contract, improve the process of administrating such contracts, and guide them in drafting a new contract when it comes to provisions related to the owner's obligations. This study fills an important gap in the body of knowledge as related to stakeholders' comparative understanding of the different standard design-build contracts. As such, it should promote efficient administration of owners' obligation clauses, thus minimizing disputes and enabling parties to mitigate the related consequences in their projects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The obligations of the different contracting parties are set forth in most standard forms of contract. Despite that, research has shown that poor contract administration is one of the major causes of disputes in construction projects. The objective of this paper is to present contract administration guidelines for appropriate utilization and administration of the provisions related to owners' nonpayment obligations under design-build contracts. In doing so, the authors (1) analyze the provisions related to the owner's obligations under the most common national and international forms of design-build contract, (2) highlight the differences and commonalities among the analyzed contracts in a summarized form, and (3) present extensive guidelines in a checklist form to assess the parties' understanding of their contract, improve the process of administrating such contracts, and guide them in drafting a new contract when it comes to provisions related to the owner's obligations. This study fills an important gap in the body of knowledge as related to stakeholders' comparative understanding of the different standard design-build contracts. As such, it should promote efficient administration of owners' obligation clauses, thus minimizing disputes and enabling parties to mitigate the related consequences in their projects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The obligations of the different contracting parties are set forth in most standard forms of contract. Despite that, research has shown that poor contract administration is one of the major causes of disputes in construction projects. The objective of this paper is to present contract administration guidelines for appropriate utilization and administration of the provisions related to owners' nonpayment obligations under design-build contracts. In doing so, the authors (1) analyze the provisions related to the owner's obligations under the most common national and international forms of design-build contract, (2) highlight the differences and commonalities among the analyzed contracts in a summarized form, and (3) present extensive guidelines in a checklist form to assess the parties' understanding of their contract, improve the process of administrating such contracts, and guide them in drafting a new contract when it comes to provisions related to the owner's obligations. This study fills an important gap in the body of knowledge as related to stakeholders' comparative understanding of the different standard design-build contracts. As such, it should promote efficient administration of owners' obligation clauses, thus minimizing disputes and enabling parties to mitigate the related consequences in their projects.

Key concepts: Obligation, Contract management, Business, Process (computing), Administration (probate law), Set (abstract data type), Construction contract, Checklist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Guidelines for Administrating and Drafting Nonpayment Owners' Obligation Provisions under Design-Build Contracts — Research Paper | ScholarLens