2018•Unpublished venueRequires access

Safety Certification of Mixed-Criticality Systems

Imanol Martínez, Gerd Bouwer, F. Chauvel, Odd Ivar Haugen, R. Heinen, G. Klaes, Asier Larrucea Ortube, Carlos Fernando Nicolás, Peio Onaindia, K. Pankhania, Jon Perez-Cerrolaza, Anatoly Vasilevskiy

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter explains the overall DREAMS safety certification strategy. It describes basic certification concepts and their applicability to mixed-criticality multi-core systems. It analyses the safety certification strategy with the description of modular safety cases, mixed-criticality solution patterns, DREAMS Functional Safety Management, product lines and a methodology for the certification of mixed-criticality product lines. The chapter explores the proposed method for the certification of mixed-criticality product lines. ‘Evaluation’ is the same activity which is referred to in IEC 61508 as ‘assessment’ or ‘functional safety assessment’ since it is a standard for Functional Safety. The IEC 61508 safety standard covers the failures caused by memory sharing such as the causal factors of the execution interference between components of a single computer platform. The harmonization of the underlying requirements from different safety standards is an ongoing trend, although currently, no cross-domain solution copes with the differences between the safety standards.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explains the overall DREAMS safety certification strategy. It describes basic certification concepts and their applicability to mixed-criticality multi-core systems. It analyses the safety certification strategy with the description of modular safety cases, mixed-criticality solution patterns, DREAMS Functional Safety Management, product lines and a methodology for the certification of mixed-criticality product lines. The chapter explores the proposed method for the certification of mixed-criticality product lines. ‘Evaluation’ is the same activity which is referred to in IEC 61508 as ‘assessment’ or ‘functional safety assessment’ since it is a standard for Functional Safety. The IEC 61508 safety standard covers the failures caused by memory sharing such as the causal factors of the execution interference between components of a single computer platform. The harmonization of the underlying requirements from different safety standards is an ongoing trend, although currently, no cross-domain solution copes with the differences between the safety standards.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explains the overall DREAMS safety certification strategy. It describes basic certification concepts and their applicability to mixed-criticality multi-core systems. It analyses the safety certification strategy with the description of modular safety cases, mixed-criticality solution patterns, DREAMS Functional Safety Management, product lines and a methodology for the certification of mixed-criticality product lines. The chapter explores the proposed method for the certification of mixed-criticality product lines. ‘Evaluation’ is the same activity which is referred to in IEC 61508 as ‘assessment’ or ‘functional safety assessment’ since it is a standard for Functional Safety. The IEC 61508 safety standard covers the failures caused by memory sharing such as the causal factors of the execution interference between components of a single computer platform. The harmonization of the underlying requirements from different safety standards is an ongoing trend, although currently, no cross-domain solution copes with the differences between the safety standards.

Key concepts: Certification, Criticality, Computer science, Political science, Physics, Nuclear physics, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety Certification of Mixed-Criticality Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens