1985•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Economic Approaches to Overhead Costs an Application of Multiproduct Cost Theory,

Robert B. Giffin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An important element of military production cost is the overhead cost component. At the elemental level, overhead costs represent costs that are indirect - in other words, costs that cannot be unambiguously assigned to more than one product. To the extent that detailed cost accounting can make reasonable allocations of these costs, they are unimportant. However, many of the contractors that produce military hardware also produce similar hardware for commercial applications within the same division. This is good in that it enables them to exploit significant economies of scale. Unfortunately, this also creates ambiguity in the assignment of overhead costs between military and commercial production. Even if a correct allocation rule for every indirect cost of military production is known, it is impossible to calculate the exact amount of overhead cost assigned to military production. This paper addresses some of the most important of these problems and examines how they have been dealt with in the literature. These issues include the relationship between accounting data and economic cost information, selection of appropriate functional forms, and trade-offs between detail and statistical validity. Several recent applications of this methodology to the telecommunications industry are discussed, along with current research efforts in the area of naval jet engine production. The paper concludes with a discussion of the general applicability of this approach to other military settings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An important element of military production cost is the overhead cost component. At the elemental level, overhead costs represent costs that are indirect - in other words, costs that cannot be unambiguously assigned to more than one product. To the extent that detailed cost accounting can make reasonable allocations of these costs, they are unimportant. However, many of the contractors that produce military hardware also produce similar hardware for commercial applications within the same division. This is good in that it enables them to exploit significant economies of scale. Unfortunately, this also creates ambiguity in the assignment of overhead costs between military and commercial production. Even if a correct allocation rule for every indirect cost of military production is known, it is impossible to calculate the exact amount of overhead cost assigned to military production. This paper addresses some of the most important of these problems and examines how they have been dealt with in the literature. These issues include the relationship between accounting data and economic cost information, selection of appropriate functional forms, and trade-offs between detail and statistical validity. Several recent applications of this methodology to the telecommunications industry are discussed, along with current research efforts in the area of naval jet engine production. The paper concludes with a discussion of the general applicability of this approach to other military settings.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An important element of military production cost is the overhead cost component. At the elemental level, overhead costs represent costs that are indirect - in other words, costs that cannot be unambiguously assigned to more than one product. To the extent that detailed cost accounting can make reasonable allocations of these costs, they are unimportant. However, many of the contractors that produce military hardware also produce similar hardware for commercial applications within the same division. This is good in that it enables them to exploit significant economies of scale. Unfortunately, this also creates ambiguity in the assignment of overhead costs between military and commercial production. Even if a correct allocation rule for every indirect cost of military production is known, it is impossible to calculate the exact amount of overhead cost assigned to military production. This paper addresses some of the most important of these problems and examines how they have been dealt with in the literature. These issues include the relationship between accounting data and economic cost information, selection of appropriate functional forms, and trade-offs between detail and statistical validity. Several recent applications of this methodology to the telecommunications industry are discussed, along with current research efforts in the area of naval jet engine production. The paper concludes with a discussion of the general applicability of this approach to other military settings.

Key concepts: Overhead (engineering), Production (economics), Exploit, Economies of scale, Operations research, Cost driver, Product (mathematics), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economic Approaches to Overhead Costs an Application of Multiproduct Cost Theory, — Research Paper | ScholarLens