2019•bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Open access

Coronary atherosclerosis: Un-altered physiology

Paul de Groot, Roel W. Veldhuizen

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background End-stage coronary artery atherosclerosis has been studied extensively but the exact mechanisms of initiation and progression have not been defined fully. The aim of this study was to mathematically describe luminal change in relation to coronary vessel wall thickness in its progression from normal to atherosclerotic to establish whether these explain the pathophysiology. Methods One hundred coronary artery sections were graded histologically as ‘normal’ to ‘highly atherosclerotic’. Random systemic sampling by image analysis yielded 32 measurements (lumen radius and intima, medial, and adventitial thickness) from each section along 32 evenly spaced radii. Results The raw data follow an undulating course in relation to successive segments in all sections analyzed, pointing to a dynamic and well-ordered system. The calculated values, studied in triplets, followed a non-synchronized parabolic course, which was converted to linearity by taking the change in numbers (n-(n-1)=Δ) into account. The course and sign of ‘Δvessel wall’ (resulting from summed Δintima, Δmedia, Δadventitia) and ‘Δlumen radius’ values were unique for each triplet. Triplets order according to ‘Δlumen radius minus Δvessel wall’ and its course given by the trendline a-value presented stages in which increased Δvessel wall resulted in increased Δlumen radius in stages 1 and 3 and decreased Δlumen radius in stage 2. This phenomenon was found in all sections regardless of histological indication and independent of vessel wall constituent parts (intima, media, adventitia). Conclusions Similar basic processes are defined in all sections regardless of histological rating, indicating un-altered physiology. As such, coronary atherosclerosis can only be defined by a large to small shift of the triplets Δvessel wall trendline a-value. Consequently, no parameter of vessel wall pathology exists in absolute terms. Vessel wall composition has no importance for Δlumen radius.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Background End-stage coronary artery atherosclerosis has been studied extensively but the exact mechanisms of initiation and progression have not been defined fully. The aim of this study was to mathematically describe luminal change in relation to coronary vessel wall thickness in its progression from normal to atherosclerotic to establish whether these explain the pathophysiology. Methods One hundred coronary artery sections were graded histologically as ‘normal’ to ‘highly atherosclerotic’. Random systemic sampling by image analysis yielded 32 measurements (lumen radius and intima, medial, and adventitial thickness) from each section along 32 evenly spaced radii. Results The raw data follow an undulating course in relation to successive segments in all sections analyzed, pointing to a dynamic and well-ordered system. The calculated values, studied in triplets, followed a non-synchronized parabolic course, which was converted to linearity by taking the change in numbers (n-(n-1)=Δ) into account. The course and sign of ‘Δvessel wall’ (resulting from summed Δintima, Δmedia, Δadventitia) and ‘Δlumen radius’ values were unique for each triplet. Triplets order according to ‘Δlumen radius minus Δvessel wall’ and its course given by the trendline a-value presented stages in which increased Δvessel wall resulted in increased Δlumen radius in stages 1 and 3 and decreased Δlumen radius in stage 2. This phenomenon was found in all sections regardless of histological indication and independent of vessel wall constituent parts (intima, media, adventitia). Conclusions Similar basic processes are defined in all sections regardless of histological rating, indicating un-altered physiology. As such, coronary atherosclerosis can only be defined by a large to small shift of the triplets Δvessel wall trendline a-value. Consequently, no parameter of vessel wall pathology exists in absolute terms. Vessel wall composition has no importance for Δlumen radius.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Background End-stage coronary artery atherosclerosis has been studied extensively but the exact mechanisms of initiation and progression have not been defined fully. The aim of this study was to mathematically describe luminal change in relation to coronary vessel wall thickness in its progression from normal to atherosclerotic to establish whether these explain the pathophysiology. Methods One hundred coronary artery sections were graded histologically as ‘normal’ to ‘highly atherosclerotic’. Random systemic sampling by image analysis yielded 32 measurements (lumen radius and intima, medial, and adventitial thickness) from each section along 32 evenly spaced radii. Results The raw data follow an undulating course in relation to successive segments in all sections analyzed, pointing to a dynamic and well-ordered system. The calculated values, studied in triplets, followed a non-synchronized parabolic course, which was converted to linearity by taking the change in numbers (n-(n-1)=Δ) into account. The course and sign of ‘Δvessel wall’ (resulting from summed Δintima, Δmedia, Δadventitia) and ‘Δlumen radius’ values were unique for each triplet. Triplets order according to ‘Δlumen radius minus Δvessel wall’ and its course given by the trendline a-value presented stages in which increased Δvessel wall resulted in increased Δlumen radius in stages 1 and 3 and decreased Δlumen radius in stage 2. This phenomenon was found in all sections regardless of histological indication and independent of vessel wall constituent parts (intima, media, adventitia). Conclusions Similar basic processes are defined in all sections regardless of histological rating, indicating un-altered physiology. As such, coronary atherosclerosis can only be defined by a large to small shift of the triplets Δvessel wall trendline a-value. Consequently, no parameter of vessel wall pathology exists in absolute terms. Vessel wall composition has no importance for Δlumen radius.

Key concepts: Adventitia, Lumen (anatomy), Artery, Coronary atherosclerosis, Anatomy, Coronary arteries, Medicine, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coronary atherosclerosis: Un-altered physiology — Research Paper | ScholarLens