2018Unpublished venueRequires access

‘Land’, ‘Tenure’ and Land-Tenure

Paul Bohannan

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

It is probable that no single topic has exercised so many students and men of affairs concerned with Africa as has that of land. It is equally probable that no single topic concerning Africa has produced so large a poor literature. We are still abysmally ignorant of African land practices. That ignorance derives less from want of ‘facts’ than that we do not know what to do with ‘facts’ or how to interpret them. The reason for this state of affairs is close at hand: there exists no good analysis of the concepts habitually used in land-tenure studies, and certainly no detailed critique of their applicability to cross-cultural study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is probable that no single topic has exercised so many students and men of affairs concerned with Africa as has that of land. It is equally probable that no single topic concerning Africa has produced so large a poor literature. We are still abysmally ignorant of African land practices. That ignorance derives less from want of ‘facts’ than that we do not know what to do with ‘facts’ or how to interpret them. The reason for this state of affairs is close at hand: there exists no good analysis of the concepts habitually used in land-tenure studies, and certainly no detailed critique of their applicability to cross-cultural study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is probable that no single topic has exercised so many students and men of affairs concerned with Africa as has that of land. It is equally probable that no single topic concerning Africa has produced so large a poor literature. We are still abysmally ignorant of African land practices. That ignorance derives less from want of ‘facts’ than that we do not know what to do with ‘facts’ or how to interpret them. The reason for this state of affairs is close at hand: there exists no good analysis of the concepts habitually used in land-tenure studies, and certainly no detailed critique of their applicability to cross-cultural study.

Key concepts: Land tenure, Business, Geography, Agriculture, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
‘Land’, ‘Tenure’ and Land-Tenure — Research Paper | ScholarLens