Principal leadership effects on student achievement: a multilevel analysis using Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 data
Huang Wu, Xingyuan Gao, Jianping Shen
Abstract
Huang Wu, Xingyuan Gao, Jianping Shen
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between principals’ leadership and student achievement. Based on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 United States data, a two-level hierarchical linear model (HLM) with students nested within principals and schools was applied. The findings showed (a) that principals’ rating of their own overall leadership was statistically negatively related to student achievement, (b) that among the four subscales of principal self-rated leadership, instructional leadership was statistically positively related to student achievement, while leadership for teacher development was negatively related to student achievement and (c) that principal leadership’s effect on student achievement was moderated by school contextual variables. Implications of the findings were discussed.
OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study examines the relationship between principals’ leadership and student achievement. Based on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 United States data, a two-level hierarchical linear model (HLM) with students nested within principals and schools was applied. The findings showed (a) that principals’ rating of their own overall leadership was statistically negatively related to student achievement, (b) that among the four subscales of principal self-rated leadership, instructional leadership was statistically positively related to student achievement, while leadership for teacher development was negatively related to student achievement and (c) that principal leadership’s effect on student achievement was moderated by school contextual variables. Implications of the findings were discussed.
Key concepts: Student achievement, Multilevel model, Instructional leadership, Psychology, Principal (computer security), Educational leadership, Academic achievement, Mathematics education