2019Journal of Constructivist PsychologyRequires access

The Dialogical Subject and its Multiple and Opposing Positions

Anna Saenco, Stéphane Laurens

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The aim of our study is to describe how the voices of others constitute the dialogical subject: an individual who is not closed off from others, but is, rather, characterized by intersubjectivity and a plurality of positions in connection with those of others. Analysis of ten semi-structured interviews carried out on members of an association supporting the right of fathers to joint custody of children shows that interviewees employed a wide variety of voices – voices in support of shared custody, but also voices which opposed it. While they most often identified with and assumed voices in favor of joint custody, they also did so with voices expressing opposing positions. Our results belie the common expectation that individuals who are committed to a cause will not be open to the opinions of others, and are incapable of seeing the world from others’ points of view.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of our study is to describe how the voices of others constitute the dialogical subject: an individual who is not closed off from others, but is, rather, characterized by intersubjectivity and a plurality of positions in connection with those of others. Analysis of ten semi-structured interviews carried out on members of an association supporting the right of fathers to joint custody of children shows that interviewees employed a wide variety of voices – voices in support of shared custody, but also voices which opposed it. While they most often identified with and assumed voices in favor of joint custody, they also did so with voices expressing opposing positions. Our results belie the common expectation that individuals who are committed to a cause will not be open to the opinions of others, and are incapable of seeing the world from others’ points of view.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of our study is to describe how the voices of others constitute the dialogical subject: an individual who is not closed off from others, but is, rather, characterized by intersubjectivity and a plurality of positions in connection with those of others. Analysis of ten semi-structured interviews carried out on members of an association supporting the right of fathers to joint custody of children shows that interviewees employed a wide variety of voices – voices in support of shared custody, but also voices which opposed it. While they most often identified with and assumed voices in favor of joint custody, they also did so with voices expressing opposing positions. Our results belie the common expectation that individuals who are committed to a cause will not be open to the opinions of others, and are incapable of seeing the world from others’ points of view.

Key concepts: Dialogical self, Intersubjectivity, Subject (documents), Variety (cybernetics), Psychology, Association (psychology), Social psychology, Connection (principal bundle)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Dialogical Subject and its Multiple and Opposing Positions — Research Paper | ScholarLens