The Dialogical Subject and its Multiple and Opposing Positions
Anna Saenco, Stéphane Laurens
Abstract
Anna Saenco, Stéphane Laurens
Abstract
The aim of our study is to describe how the voices of others constitute the dialogical subject: an individual who is not closed off from others, but is, rather, characterized by intersubjectivity and a plurality of positions in connection with those of others. Analysis of ten semi-structured interviews carried out on members of an association supporting the right of fathers to joint custody of children shows that interviewees employed a wide variety of voices – voices in support of shared custody, but also voices which opposed it. While they most often identified with and assumed voices in favor of joint custody, they also did so with voices expressing opposing positions. Our results belie the common expectation that individuals who are committed to a cause will not be open to the opinions of others, and are incapable of seeing the world from others’ points of view.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The aim of our study is to describe how the voices of others constitute the dialogical subject: an individual who is not closed off from others, but is, rather, characterized by intersubjectivity and a plurality of positions in connection with those of others. Analysis of ten semi-structured interviews carried out on members of an association supporting the right of fathers to joint custody of children shows that interviewees employed a wide variety of voices – voices in support of shared custody, but also voices which opposed it. While they most often identified with and assumed voices in favor of joint custody, they also did so with voices expressing opposing positions. Our results belie the common expectation that individuals who are committed to a cause will not be open to the opinions of others, and are incapable of seeing the world from others’ points of view.
Key concepts: Dialogical self, Intersubjectivity, Subject (documents), Variety (cybernetics), Psychology, Association (psychology), Social psychology, Connection (principal bundle)