2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Public finance and financial management

Changhoon Jung

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter describes the public finance and financial management systems in Korea. It discusses the scope and the size of central government, major revenue sources, functional expenditure, and fiscal balance. The chapter explains the current state of Korean budgetary institutions, processes, and major recent budgetary and financial management reform initiatives. The National Assembly is a relatively weak player in the budgetary process on two grounds. First, time allotted for budget review is usually less than two weeks of the 90-day regular session. Second, the heads of line ministries can, without approval from the National Assembly, increase outlays of public funds by up to 30 percent. The central Budget Office reviews agency requests by comparing information regarding program execution status, performance, and feasibility and approves these agency requests should they meet the overall expenditure ceilings and agenda priorities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter describes the public finance and financial management systems in Korea. It discusses the scope and the size of central government, major revenue sources, functional expenditure, and fiscal balance. The chapter explains the current state of Korean budgetary institutions, processes, and major recent budgetary and financial management reform initiatives. The National Assembly is a relatively weak player in the budgetary process on two grounds. First, time allotted for budget review is usually less than two weeks of the 90-day regular session. Second, the heads of line ministries can, without approval from the National Assembly, increase outlays of public funds by up to 30 percent. The central Budget Office reviews agency requests by comparing information regarding program execution status, performance, and feasibility and approves these agency requests should they meet the overall expenditure ceilings and agenda priorities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter describes the public finance and financial management systems in Korea. It discusses the scope and the size of central government, major revenue sources, functional expenditure, and fiscal balance. The chapter explains the current state of Korean budgetary institutions, processes, and major recent budgetary and financial management reform initiatives. The National Assembly is a relatively weak player in the budgetary process on two grounds. First, time allotted for budget review is usually less than two weeks of the 90-day regular session. Second, the heads of line ministries can, without approval from the National Assembly, increase outlays of public funds by up to 30 percent. The central Budget Office reviews agency requests by comparing information regarding program execution status, performance, and feasibility and approves these agency requests should they meet the overall expenditure ceilings and agenda priorities.

Key concepts: Public finance, Business, Finance, Financial management, Economics, Macroeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public finance and financial management — Research Paper | ScholarLens