2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Traffic Calming Process

Reid Ewing, Steven J Brown

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter draws on a survey of leading jurisdictions conducted for Sacramento County in 2004. The majority of leading jurisdictions have adopted priority rating systems. Priority rating reduces political influences and increases program effectiveness in the face of public demands exceeding the supply of available funds. The chapter focuses on procedural issues and covers everything from program design to project monitoring. It is the detailed survey of US traffic calming programs since the 1997–1998 survey for TrafficCalming: State of the Practice. Staff and the neighborhood traffic committee review traffic data for the study area and formulate ideas about how best to address traffic problems. The chapter compares our findings with the earlier survey. It identifies how policies and practices have changed as the field has matured. The chapter outlines similarities and differences across programs as they operated. A program structure has four phases: project initiation, project development, project approval, and project implementation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter draws on a survey of leading jurisdictions conducted for Sacramento County in 2004. The majority of leading jurisdictions have adopted priority rating systems. Priority rating reduces political influences and increases program effectiveness in the face of public demands exceeding the supply of available funds. The chapter focuses on procedural issues and covers everything from program design to project monitoring. It is the detailed survey of US traffic calming programs since the 1997–1998 survey for TrafficCalming: State of the Practice. Staff and the neighborhood traffic committee review traffic data for the study area and formulate ideas about how best to address traffic problems. The chapter compares our findings with the earlier survey. It identifies how policies and practices have changed as the field has matured. The chapter outlines similarities and differences across programs as they operated. A program structure has four phases: project initiation, project development, project approval, and project implementation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter draws on a survey of leading jurisdictions conducted for Sacramento County in 2004. The majority of leading jurisdictions have adopted priority rating systems. Priority rating reduces political influences and increases program effectiveness in the face of public demands exceeding the supply of available funds. The chapter focuses on procedural issues and covers everything from program design to project monitoring. It is the detailed survey of US traffic calming programs since the 1997–1998 survey for TrafficCalming: State of the Practice. Staff and the neighborhood traffic committee review traffic data for the study area and formulate ideas about how best to address traffic problems. The chapter compares our findings with the earlier survey. It identifies how policies and practices have changed as the field has matured. The chapter outlines similarities and differences across programs as they operated. A program structure has four phases: project initiation, project development, project approval, and project implementation.

Key concepts: Traffic calming, Computer science, Process (computing), Engineering, Transport engineering, Operating system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Traffic Calming Process — Research Paper | ScholarLens