2018Unpublished venueRequires access

EU Cohesion policy

Marek Kozák, Paweł Opala, Paweł Samecki

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter seeks to answer questions about the future of the Cohesion policy beyond the end of the present financial perspective. Until the mid-1980s, Cohesion policy, despite the expectations and the recommendations of numerous experts and politicians, did not play a significant role in European Union (EU) policies and budgets. Data published by independent researchers are less optimistic in their evaluation of Cohesion policy. Most of them suggest that, at best, the impacts of Cohesion policy are conditional, as they depend on the quality of the institutional system in a recipient Member State. A more conventional Cohesion policy would widen the territory of more active growth. ESPON does not provide direct answers; it limits presentation to the formulation of possible choices. Expenditure on Cohesion policy has been to a great degree, at least in recent decades, a function of the overall EU budget.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter seeks to answer questions about the future of the Cohesion policy beyond the end of the present financial perspective. Until the mid-1980s, Cohesion policy, despite the expectations and the recommendations of numerous experts and politicians, did not play a significant role in European Union (EU) policies and budgets. Data published by independent researchers are less optimistic in their evaluation of Cohesion policy. Most of them suggest that, at best, the impacts of Cohesion policy are conditional, as they depend on the quality of the institutional system in a recipient Member State. A more conventional Cohesion policy would widen the territory of more active growth. ESPON does not provide direct answers; it limits presentation to the formulation of possible choices. Expenditure on Cohesion policy has been to a great degree, at least in recent decades, a function of the overall EU budget.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter seeks to answer questions about the future of the Cohesion policy beyond the end of the present financial perspective. Until the mid-1980s, Cohesion policy, despite the expectations and the recommendations of numerous experts and politicians, did not play a significant role in European Union (EU) policies and budgets. Data published by independent researchers are less optimistic in their evaluation of Cohesion policy. Most of them suggest that, at best, the impacts of Cohesion policy are conditional, as they depend on the quality of the institutional system in a recipient Member State. A more conventional Cohesion policy would widen the territory of more active growth. ESPON does not provide direct answers; it limits presentation to the formulation of possible choices. Expenditure on Cohesion policy has been to a great degree, at least in recent decades, a function of the overall EU budget.

Key concepts: Cohesion (chemistry), Political science, Physics, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EU Cohesion policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens