2019Dental Materials JournalOpen access

Fracture toughness of experimental mica-based glass-ceramics and four commercial glass-ceramics restorative dental materials

Thapanee Srichumpong, Pimnida Phokhinchatchanan, Noparat Thongpun, Duangrudee Chaysuwan, Kallaya Suputtamongkol

Open full text 15 citations

Abstract

The mica-based glass-ceramics were prepared in the SiO2-Al2O3-MgO-MgF2-SrCO3-CaCO3-CaF2-P2O5 glass system. There were four mica-based glass-ceramics produced in this study according to the pigment added (CeO2 or Pr-ZrSiO4/Fe-ZrSiO4) and crystallization time (5–35 min). Four dental glass-ceramics, which were leucite-based, lithium disilicate-based and two zirconia reinforced lithium silicate ceramics, were also tested. The phase identification of mica-based glass-ceramics was performed using an X-ray diffractometer. The fracture toughness (KIC) was determined using the fractographic analysis approach. The one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the significant differences among the obtained KIC values at a=0.05. The results from the phase analysis showed that the mica glassceramics consisted of calcium-mica, fluorapatite and strontiumapatite. The KIC of mica-based glass-ceramics ranged between 1.36 to 1.53 MPa•m1/2 which were superior to only that of a leucite-based glass-ceramic. The shade and translucency of mica-based glassceramics appeared to be acceptable for dental application when compared with other dental glass-ceramics.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The mica-based glass-ceramics were prepared in the SiO2-Al2O3-MgO-MgF2-SrCO3-CaCO3-CaF2-P2O5 glass system. There were four mica-based glass-ceramics produced in this study according to the pigment added (CeO2 or Pr-ZrSiO4/Fe-ZrSiO4) and crystallization time (5–35 min). Four dental glass-ceramics, which were leucite-based, lithium disilicate-based and two zirconia reinforced lithium silicate ceramics, were also tested. The phase identification of mica-based glass-ceramics was performed using an X-ray diffractometer. The fracture toughness (KIC) was determined using the fractographic analysis approach. The one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the significant differences among the obtained KIC values at a=0.05. The results from the phase analysis showed that the mica glassceramics consisted of calcium-mica, fluorapatite and strontiumapatite. The KIC of mica-based glass-ceramics ranged between 1.36 to 1.53 MPa•m1/2 which were superior to only that of a leucite-based glass-ceramic. The shade and translucency of mica-based glassceramics appeared to be acceptable for dental application when compared with other dental glass-ceramics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The mica-based glass-ceramics were prepared in the SiO2-Al2O3-MgO-MgF2-SrCO3-CaCO3-CaF2-P2O5 glass system. There were four mica-based glass-ceramics produced in this study according to the pigment added (CeO2 or Pr-ZrSiO4/Fe-ZrSiO4) and crystallization time (5–35 min). Four dental glass-ceramics, which were leucite-based, lithium disilicate-based and two zirconia reinforced lithium silicate ceramics, were also tested. The phase identification of mica-based glass-ceramics was performed using an X-ray diffractometer. The fracture toughness (KIC) was determined using the fractographic analysis approach. The one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the significant differences among the obtained KIC values at a=0.05. The results from the phase analysis showed that the mica glassceramics consisted of calcium-mica, fluorapatite and strontiumapatite. The KIC of mica-based glass-ceramics ranged between 1.36 to 1.53 MPa•m1/2 which were superior to only that of a leucite-based glass-ceramic. The shade and translucency of mica-based glassceramics appeared to be acceptable for dental application when compared with other dental glass-ceramics.

Key concepts: Materials science, Mica, Fracture toughness, Dental ceramics, Composite material, Ceramic, Glass-ceramic, Toughness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fracture toughness of experimental mica-based glass-ceramics and four commercial glass-ceramics restorative dental materials — Research Paper | ScholarLens