2020•Unpublished venueRequires access

Notice-and-Notice-Plus: A Canadian Perspective Beyond the Liability and Immunity Divide

Emily B. Laidlaw

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapters discusses liability of online intermediaries for defamation, hate speech, and other speech-related infringements in Canada and other common law jurisdictions. After an introduction to the common law and statutory legal context, this chapter puts forward a reform proposal for online defamation. In doing so, first the chapter outlines the Notice-and-Notice-Plus (NN+) model, identifying the legal context for the proposal and sketching its main features. Secondly, this chapter explores the viability of deploying this model to other kinds of harmful speech, including fake news, terrorist content, and hate speech. All these typologies of harmful speech are discussed in detail in order to assess the optimal intermediary liability model for their regulation online.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapters discusses liability of online intermediaries for defamation, hate speech, and other speech-related infringements in Canada and other common law jurisdictions. After an introduction to the common law and statutory legal context, this chapter puts forward a reform proposal for online defamation. In doing so, first the chapter outlines the Notice-and-Notice-Plus (NN+) model, identifying the legal context for the proposal and sketching its main features. Secondly, this chapter explores the viability of deploying this model to other kinds of harmful speech, including fake news, terrorist content, and hate speech. All these typologies of harmful speech are discussed in detail in order to assess the optimal intermediary liability model for their regulation online.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapters discusses liability of online intermediaries for defamation, hate speech, and other speech-related infringements in Canada and other common law jurisdictions. After an introduction to the common law and statutory legal context, this chapter puts forward a reform proposal for online defamation. In doing so, first the chapter outlines the Notice-and-Notice-Plus (NN+) model, identifying the legal context for the proposal and sketching its main features. Secondly, this chapter explores the viability of deploying this model to other kinds of harmful speech, including fake news, terrorist content, and hate speech. All these typologies of harmful speech are discussed in detail in order to assess the optimal intermediary liability model for their regulation online.

Key concepts: Notice, Statutory law, Liability, Context (archaeology), Intermediary, Perspective (graphical), Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Notice-and-Notice-Plus: A Canadian Perspective Beyond the Liability and Immunity Divide — Research Paper | ScholarLens