2018•Chemical SensesRequires access

XXXIX Annual Meeting of the Association for Chemoreception Sciences Hyatt Regency Coconut Point, Bonita Springs, Florida

Chae, H., Otazu, G. H., Albeanu, D. F.

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The olfactory bulb (OB) output neurons, the mitral and tufted cells project in a distributed fashion to several brain areas including the piriform cortex (PC) and anterior olfactory nucleus (AON). These, in turn, send massive glutamatergic projections back into the OB. We recently reported (Otazu, Chae, et al., Neuron, 2015) that pharmacological inactivation of the anterior piriform cortex (APC) increases odor responsiveness and pairwise similarity of mitral cells, but has little impact on tufted cells. Therefore, we proposed that PC feedback specifically acts on mitral cell representations to enable odor separation, while only mildly altering tufted cell responses. However, how feedback from AON controls these two classes of OB output neurons remains unknown to date. We used multiphoton calcium imaging (GCaMP3) to monitor the odor responses of mitral and tufted cells in awake head-fixed mice. Pharmacological inactivation of the AON increased preferentially the odor responsiveness and pairwise similarity of tufted versus mitral cells. This is complementary to the effect observed when suppressing the piriform cortex. We have further monitored the activity (GCaMP6f) of granule cells, the OB inhibitory interneurons that receive most of top-down feedback from APC and AON. Feedback from AON and APC modulated GC activity in a cell and concentration specific fashion, independent of odor identity. We propose that feedback from PC and AON differentially modulates the two OB output channels. We are currently investigating whether distinct sets of GCs are differentially controlled by feedback originating in the APC vs. AON. Furthermore, we explore optogenetic strategies, and locally suppress distinct feedback signals to the bulb, to assess their contributions to olfactory behaviors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The olfactory bulb (OB) output neurons, the mitral and tufted cells project in a distributed fashion to several brain areas including the piriform cortex (PC) and anterior olfactory nucleus (AON). These, in turn, send massive glutamatergic projections back into the OB. We recently reported (Otazu, Chae, et al., Neuron, 2015) that pharmacological inactivation of the anterior piriform cortex (APC) increases odor responsiveness and pairwise similarity of mitral cells, but has little impact on tufted cells. Therefore, we proposed that PC feedback specifically acts on mitral cell representations to enable odor separation, while only mildly altering tufted cell responses. However, how feedback from AON controls these two classes of OB output neurons remains unknown to date. We used multiphoton calcium imaging (GCaMP3) to monitor the odor responses of mitral and tufted cells in awake head-fixed mice. Pharmacological inactivation of the AON increased preferentially the odor responsiveness and pairwise similarity of tufted versus mitral cells. This is complementary to the effect observed when suppressing the piriform cortex. We have further monitored the activity (GCaMP6f) of granule cells, the OB inhibitory interneurons that receive most of top-down feedback from APC and AON. Feedback from AON and APC modulated GC activity in a cell and concentration specific fashion, independent of odor identity. We propose that feedback from PC and AON differentially modulates the two OB output channels. We are currently investigating whether distinct sets of GCs are differentially controlled by feedback originating in the APC vs. AON. Furthermore, we explore optogenetic strategies, and locally suppress distinct feedback signals to the bulb, to assess their contributions to olfactory behaviors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The olfactory bulb (OB) output neurons, the mitral and tufted cells project in a distributed fashion to several brain areas including the piriform cortex (PC) and anterior olfactory nucleus (AON). These, in turn, send massive glutamatergic projections back into the OB. We recently reported (Otazu, Chae, et al., Neuron, 2015) that pharmacological inactivation of the anterior piriform cortex (APC) increases odor responsiveness and pairwise similarity of mitral cells, but has little impact on tufted cells. Therefore, we proposed that PC feedback specifically acts on mitral cell representations to enable odor separation, while only mildly altering tufted cell responses. However, how feedback from AON controls these two classes of OB output neurons remains unknown to date. We used multiphoton calcium imaging (GCaMP3) to monitor the odor responses of mitral and tufted cells in awake head-fixed mice. Pharmacological inactivation of the AON increased preferentially the odor responsiveness and pairwise similarity of tufted versus mitral cells. This is complementary to the effect observed when suppressing the piriform cortex. We have further monitored the activity (GCaMP6f) of granule cells, the OB inhibitory interneurons that receive most of top-down feedback from APC and AON. Feedback from AON and APC modulated GC activity in a cell and concentration specific fashion, independent of odor identity. We propose that feedback from PC and AON differentially modulates the two OB output channels. We are currently investigating whether distinct sets of GCs are differentially controlled by feedback originating in the APC vs. AON. Furthermore, we explore optogenetic strategies, and locally suppress distinct feedback signals to the bulb, to assess their contributions to olfactory behaviors.

Key concepts: Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
XXXIX Annual Meeting of the Association for Chemoreception Sciences Hyatt Regency Coconut Point, Bonita Springs, Florida — Research Paper | ScholarLens