2019Unpublished venueRequires access

The Classical and Keynesian Macroeconomic Paradigms

Sashi Sivramkrishna

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter presents some mainstream Keynesian ideas that influence popular macroeconomics discourse. To the right of the Keynesians are the classical economists who believe that the role of the state should primarily be confined to the provision of public goods like street lighting, policing and defence services, education and health where market failure is inevitable. Within the Keynesian paradigm there are sub-schools of thought that are considered mainstream whereas some are kept out of the mainstream. In the context of market capitalism, the two dominant schools of thought driving mainstream macroeconomic discourse are the Keynesian and the classical. Keynes was not in favour of central planning as a substitute for a competitive market system. Many believed that through his theory, Keynes was able to resurrect the market system from its collapse on a grand scale during the Great Depression of the 1930s, which may have, left to its own, been the basis for a communist revolution in the 1930s.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter presents some mainstream Keynesian ideas that influence popular macroeconomics discourse. To the right of the Keynesians are the classical economists who believe that the role of the state should primarily be confined to the provision of public goods like street lighting, policing and defence services, education and health where market failure is inevitable. Within the Keynesian paradigm there are sub-schools of thought that are considered mainstream whereas some are kept out of the mainstream. In the context of market capitalism, the two dominant schools of thought driving mainstream macroeconomic discourse are the Keynesian and the classical. Keynes was not in favour of central planning as a substitute for a competitive market system. Many believed that through his theory, Keynes was able to resurrect the market system from its collapse on a grand scale during the Great Depression of the 1930s, which may have, left to its own, been the basis for a communist revolution in the 1930s.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter presents some mainstream Keynesian ideas that influence popular macroeconomics discourse. To the right of the Keynesians are the classical economists who believe that the role of the state should primarily be confined to the provision of public goods like street lighting, policing and defence services, education and health where market failure is inevitable. Within the Keynesian paradigm there are sub-schools of thought that are considered mainstream whereas some are kept out of the mainstream. In the context of market capitalism, the two dominant schools of thought driving mainstream macroeconomic discourse are the Keynesian and the classical. Keynes was not in favour of central planning as a substitute for a competitive market system. Many believed that through his theory, Keynes was able to resurrect the market system from its collapse on a grand scale during the Great Depression of the 1930s, which may have, left to its own, been the basis for a communist revolution in the 1930s.

Key concepts: Keynesian economics, Economics, New Keynesian economics, Neoclassical economics, Mathematical economics, Monetary policy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Classical and Keynesian Macroeconomic Paradigms — Research Paper | ScholarLens